Egypt: Simplified cartel leniency procedures

Marker system and an anonymous preliminary discussion mechanism for potential applicants introduced

In brief

What has changed

In July 2020, the Egyptian Competition Authority ('ECA') issued guidelines regarding the scope of and procedures relating to the leniency regime as stated in Article (26) of the Egyptian Competition Law ('ECL'). 

Since the adoption of the leniency regime in 2014, a number of leniency applications have  been submitted to the ECA. However, new guidelines build upon previous experiences and attempt to expand and facilitate the process by introducing new elements, such as informal discussions with the regulator and a marker system, in an attempt to increase transparency and the efficiency of the regime.


Key Takeaways 

  • Companies are now entitled to apply for a marker for leniency in Egypt.
  • The leniency regime is now more transparent and grants more protections to the leniency applicants.
  • Principals whose  agents are involved in a cartel can now both benefit from leniency.
  • Companies need to be ensure that they operate within the permitted parameters of the ECL.  With the number of leniency applications already on the rise, these latest guidelines may encourage more companies to come forward and apply for leniency.

What is the Development About

The existing leniency regime is only applicable to horizontal agreements. Previously, the main features of the regime were stated in the ECL and the accompanying executive regulations. However, the regime remained underutilized, as a result of a number of practical difficulties and ambiguities facing enforcement.

These new guidelines highlight the detailed requirements of a successful leniency application and introduces a marker system along with a process to informally discuss any potential application (on a no names and no relevant market basis).

It has also settled a discourse that took place previously and confirmed that it is possible to obtain  corporate leniency along with individual leniency. Regarding corporate leniency, the definition has been expanded to include current and previous board members, employees, and more importantly independent agents. 

What it means for you

Whenever an individual or company is involved in a cartel it needs to promptly assess its risks and consider whether it would be in their best interest to report the incident to the ECA.

Main benefits of the leniency regime to companies:

  1. Total individual and/or company immunity from criminal liability.
  2. Protection of the reputation of the applicant, as the applicant will be treated as a witness rather than a defendant and, consequently, its name will not not mentioned as a defendant in the published court decision.
  3. Does not risk losing its imports license.
  4. Does not risk facing other sanctions under the Public Tenders laws and regulations.

As stated in the ECL, there are requirements for a successful leniency application including:

  1. The company must submit a leniency application before any decision by the Board Members of ECA issue a decision in relation to a cartel.
  2. The applicant must submit sufficient evidence to prove the crime.
  3. The applicant must cease its participation in the cartel, unless the ECA, in order to ensure confidentiality/prevent tipping off, permits the applicant to continue to engage in the cartel.
  4. The applicant must submit a detailed legal memorandum including detailed information about the cartel. 

As noted, individuals and companies are entitled to submit leniency applications. This means that an employee wihtin a company can decide to expose information to the ECA. In this case leniency will only be granted to the employee and will not be extended to the whole company.

The ECA has also introduced a marker system whereby if a company/individual has incomplete information about the cartel, it may still apply for a marker to reserve first place as a potential leniency applicant. However, the person will need to complete the said application within 30 days from the date of the marker. 

Finally, the ECA has established an informal discussion mechanism. Under this system, parties or their representatives can explore with the ECA the possibility of submitting a leniency application while maintaining the anonymity of the potential applicant and the relevant market concerned. This could be very useful to potential applicants as they would be able assess their legal position without the risk of exposure to the ECA. This mechanism will also allow potential applicants to get further clarity on any pending questions they may have regarding their specific case.  

The ECA has also confirmed that it is strictly committed to confidentiality as mandated under the ECL    

Contact Information

Copyright © 2023 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.