No more reasons to say "I don't know"
With KPPU CR 3/2023 laying down so many possible scenarios and indications of rigged bids from the planning stage, formation of the procurement committee stage, prequalification stage and open tender process, up to the appeal and decision-making stage, there are no more reasons for business actors to say they don't know how to identify a potentially rigged bid.
KPPU CR 3/2023 clarifies that the prohibition of tender conspiracy set out under Article 22 of the Anti-Monopoly Law (Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic and Unfair Business Practices) applies not only to public/government tenders, but also to tenders in the private sector.
KPPU CR 3/2023 also states that indirect or circumstantial evidence in the form of communication evidence or economic evidence may be used as a form of "Indication", which is a type of evidence recognized under Article 42 of the Anti-Monopoly Law.
In a rigged public/government procurement involving government officials, KPPU may also coordinate its efforts with other law enforcement authorities (e.g., the Attorney General Office or the Corruption Eradication Commission) to carry out criminal investigation.
We summarized the rigged-bid indicators under KPPU CR 3/2023 in our 2023 Competition Law Guide.
Aggressive regulation-making activity by KPPU during leadership transitional period
KPPU seems to be very active at issuing regulations and chairman regulations during its leadership transitional period. Within the last couple of months, KPPU announced a new merger filing regulation, a new case-handling regulation, a new policy-influencing regulation, and three new chairman regulations on defining relevant market, paying administrative fines by instalments, and negative impact.
* * * * *
© 2023 HHP Law Firm. All rights reserved. HHP Law Firm is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
