Japan: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

In brief

The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) announced closure of the investigation against Rakuten after accepting voluntary remedial measures from the company.

This update was published as part of our quarterly newsletter, Asia Pacific Competition Highlights. Click here to access the full report, which covers the most notable antitrust developments across 10 Asia Pacific jurisdictions.


Contents

JFTC closes investigation for suspected abusive conduct relating to online free shipping program

Rakuten, one of the biggest online mall operators in Japan, announced in 2019 a plan to introduce a free shipping services program for shopping of JPY 3,980 or more on its online mall from March 2020, under which merchants using Rakuten's online retail platform would bear the shipping cost. In February 2020, the JFTC filed an uncommon petition for an urgent injunction order to the court to suspend the introduction of the program.

The JFTC withdrew the petition following Rakuten's decision to postpone the introduction of the program to all merchants. However, the JFTC continued its investigation and found that Rakuten forced some merchants to join the program by imposing certain disadvantages on them. For instance, the products of those merchants who did not want to join the program were ranked lower in search results. The JFTC suspected that this conduct might have constituted an abuse of superior bargaining position.

In response to the JFTC's investigation, Rakuten proposed certain voluntary remedial measures, including that Rakuten would respect the merchants' decision as to whether to join the program and would not impose any disadvantage on non-joiners. The JFTC concluded that Rakuten's proposed measures would resolve its concerns and decided to close the investigation.

This case was, somewhat controversially, closed without using the commitment procedure, which was introduced in December 2018 and has been used actively since 2020. JFTC officials said that the JFTC decided to accept Rakuten's voluntary proposal since it was most appropriate to resolve the anti-competitive issues and restore competition promptly. This case illustrates that competition issues surrounding the digital market remain a key priority of the JFTC.

For more detail, please refer to the JFTC's press release.

Related alerts

 

Australia: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

China: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

Hong Kong: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

Indonesia: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

Malaysia: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

Singapore: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

Taiwan: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

Thailand: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

Vietnam: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights, Q4 2021

 


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.