Mexico: COFECE investigates possible cartel practices in the market of public procurement procedures

In brief

The Investigating Authority of the Federal Economic Competition Commission (COFECE) published on 12 October 2022, a notice initiating an investigation, for alleged anticompetitive conduct of horizontal monopolistic practices (or cartel practices) in the market of public procurement procedures for the acquisition, leasing, maintenance services and managed services of information and communication technologies.

The market under investigation is related to products such as desktop and laptop computers, televisions, photocopiers, computer cameras, storage equipment, and associated products, in the national territory. Additionally, the investigation includes the contracting or purchase of information and communication technologies such as, transmission services, software licensing, internet servers, as well as maintenance and managed services related to information technologies. Any government contracting procedure through public procurement in the investigated market could be subject to this investigation.

If the existence of a horizontal monopolistic practice is proven, economic agents could be fined up to 10% of their annual revenues in Mexico, as well as those who have participated, contributed to this illegal conduct may be sanctioned under the Federal Mexican Criminal Code, and may be subject to up to ten years in prison.

Recommended actions

  • In this type of proceedings it is normal for the antitrust authority to request information and documents from the companies offering products and services related to the market under investigation. In the event of receiving a request for information from the antitrust authority, it is essential to respond to such request, otherwise, the defaulting company will be subject to a fine.
  • In some cases, the antitrust authority considers it pertinent to subpoena individuals who are presumed to have knowledge of the market under investigation, e.g., technical personnel or managers of companies that offer products and services related to the market under investigation. In case of receiving a subpoena, it is recommended to consult with an attorney specialized in antitrust & competition matters. 
  • The Mexican antitrust authority is empowered to conduct dawn raids (on-site unannounced visits at the company's offices, through which they may request information and/or photocopy documents related to the market under investigation). In these cases, it is recommended to contact the company's legal counsel, and seek immediate advice from an antitrust & competition lawyer. Obstruction or failure to comply with a dawn raid may result in fines and/or criminal penalties.


  • The investigations of monopolistic practices in the digital economy market have grown in popularity over the last 3 years, especially because of the existence of two antitrust authorities in Mexico: COFECE and the Federal Institute of Telecommunications (IFT). The disagreements between these institutions have often triggered dual investigations in the digital economy and at least three major controversies over which authority is competent to decide on antitrust matters. In 2020, COFECE published its Digital Strategy report to address the new challenges presented by the digitalization of the economy from a competition perspective. 
  • Recently, COFECE reaffirmed their commitment, and in its Strategic Plan 2022-2025, identified the digital markets and public procurement as a key priority sector for the competition authority. Public procurement is a priority topic, given that taxpayers' resources are used and must be allocated effectively and within a framework of competition so that they maximize their purchasing power in the best terms for the public service.
  • The investigation should not be understood as a judgment, but as an action by the authority to verify compliance with the Federal Mexican Antitrust Law.
  • Horizontal monopolistic practices are anticompetitive agreements, contracts or arrangements between competing economic agents, whose object or effect is the manipulation of prices, restriction or limitation of supply or demand, division or segmentation of markets, and, in this particular case, agreement or coordination of bids in auctions, as well as the exchange of information between competitors to carry out any of the aforementioned conducts.
  • This antitrust investigation was initiated on 31 March 2022. The inquiry period, of 120 business days,  shall be counted from this date in which the investigation period begun.
  • Each period has 120 business days, which may be extended for the same period up to four times.

Please do not hesitate to get in touch with us if you wish to discuss how this development may impact your business operations in Mexico. 

Copyright © 2023 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.