Mexico: COFECE probes the maritime transportation market in the State of Quintana Roo for possible absolute monopolistic practices

In brief

On 13 July 2021, the Federal Economic Competition Commission (COFECE) published in the Federal Official Gazette1 the notice regarding the initiation of an investigation due to possible absolute monopolistic practices allegedly carried out in the market for maritime transportation services in the state of Quintana Roo.

Absolute monopolistic practices are anti-competitive agreements, contracts or arrangements between competing economic agents, whose object or effect is the manipulation of prices, restriction or limitation of supply or demand, division or segmentation of markets, agreement or coordination of bids in auctions, as well as the exchange of information between competitors to carry out any of the aforementioned conducts. These practices can also be referred to as horizontal or cartel practices.


Contents

Cartel practices are considered null and void and, consequently, shall not produce any legal effect. If the existence of an absolute monopolistic practice is proven, the responsible economic agents may be fined up to 10% of their annual income (in Mexico). Those who have participated or contributed to a cartel practice may be imprisoned for up to ten years under Mexican criminal law.

Recommended actions

  • During this investigation process, COFECE may request information and documents from companies that offer products and services related to the market under investigation. In the event a company receives a request for information from COFECE, a response to such request is required, otherwise, the company that fails to comply with the request may be subject to a fine.
  • COFECE has the authority to conduct dawn raids (unannounced on-site visits to a company's offices, through which it may request information and/or copy documents related to the market under investigation). In these cases, it is recommended to contact the company's legal department and seek immediate advice from a lawyer specialized in antitrust matters. Obstruction or failure to comply with orders during a dawn raid may result in fines and/or criminal penalties.
  • In some cases, COFECE considers it necessary to summon certain individuals if it presumes that such individuals may have knowledge of the market under investigation. These individuals may include any technical or managerial personnel of companies offering products and services related to the market. In the event COFECE summons any of your employees, it is recommended to consult with an antitrust attorney.

In more detail

  • The investigation should not be understood as a judgment, but as an action by the authority to verify compliance with the Federal Mexican Antitrust Law.

The term for this investigation is up to 120 business days, starting 10 December 2021 - the date of the initiation of the investigation, and can be extended up to four times.


1 DOF 13 July 2022, File No. IO-004-2021, Spanish


Copyright © 2022 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.