Switzerland: Investment control law

The Swiss Federal Council decides to prepare a substantially revised draft investment control law

In brief

Following pressure from parliament, the Swiss Federal Council last year launched a consultation process on new legislation for the review of foreign investments. In May 2023, the Swiss Federal Council has taken note of the results of the consultation on the proposed investment control law. Overall, and not surprisingly, there is widespread skepticism about the draft. A majority of the participants in the consultation argued that the proposed investment control law would weaken Switzerland's attractiveness as a business location, while a significant minority sees a clear need for action and is in favor of introducing foreign investment screening also in Switzerland.

The Swiss Federal Council has therefore instructed the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER) to prepare a substantially revised draft by the end of 2023 that is limited to the screening of investments of foreign state-controlled investors taking over Swiss companies operating in a particularly critical sector, such as defense equipment, electricity transmission and production, or health and telecom infrastructures.


Contents

Background

After the Swiss Federal Council was mandated by the Parliament to create a legal basis to screen foreign direct investments, it published a draft investment control law in May 2022 and conducted a consultation on the preliminary draft of the investment control law from 18 May to 9 September 2022. The investment control law is intended to prevent foreign investments from threatening Switzerland's public order or public security. The draft published last year covered both investments by a state-owned foreign investor in general and investments into specific sectors by any foreign investor, irrespective of whether it is made by a foreign state-controlled or private investor.

Already at the opening of the consultation, the Swiss Federal Council expressed its opposition to the introduction of an investment review. In the course of the consultation process, the cantons, the political parties, the national umbrella organizations of municipalities, cities and regions, the national umbrella organizations of the business community and other interested parties were invited to submit their statements.

Majority of participants are critical

During the consultation process, 72 statements were received. A majority of 38 participants are generally opposed to the introduction of an investment review, including primarily the business associations. A minority of 29 participants are in favor of the introduction of an investment review. Out of those, 14 are in favor of the preliminary draft as presented. Five agree with the introduction of an investment review but subject to a restriction of the scope, while ten agree with the introduction of an investment review provided that the scope is extended.

Opponents argued that restricting investments would have an economically harmful effect and that the associated encroachment on economic freedom would be too significant. However, if an investment review is to be introduced, they request that the scope be limited. The main proposal is to limit investment screening to foreign state-owned investors, as potential threats are identified in particular with these investors.

Revision of the draft

On the basis of this background, on 10 May 2023, the Swiss Federal Council decided to substantially revise the draft investment control law after the consultation. The Swiss government shares the view that an investment review would weaken the economic attractiveness of Switzerland, especially if the investment control law had a broad scope and would also apply to foreign private investors. Therefore, the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research was instructed by the government to prepare a substantially revised draft for the attention of the Parliament, in line with Switzerland's international obligations. According to the instructions of the Swiss government for the new draft, investment review should only apply when a foreign state-controlled investor takes over a domestic company operating in a particularly critical area. Examples of these critical areas are: Defense equipment, electricity production and transmission, or health and telecom infrastructures. This reduced scope of the revised draft will significantly limit the adverse effects on companies compared with the initial draft that was sent out for consultation. The Swiss Federal Council has instructed the EAER to prepare a corresponding draft by the end of 2023.

Once the revised draft is available, the draft will be submitted to parliament for a detailed deliberation. During the parliamentary debate, everything remains open: from full rejection, acceptance of the proposal to even introducing stricter rules and broadening the scope of the law again. Upon deliberations by parliament, the final law could and likely would be subject to a referendum vote by the Swiss public. It will depend very much what will ultimately see the light of day and how Switzerland will apply such instrument in practice.

Contact Information
Roger Thomi
Partner at BakerMcKenzie
Zürich
Read my Bio
roger.thomi@bakermckenzie.com
Boris Wenger
Partner at BakerMcKenzie
Zürich
Read my Bio
boris.wenger@bakermckenzie.com

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.