United States: Blowing the Whistle on Collusion – New DOJ Antitrust Division Program

In brief

The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, in partnership with the U.S. Postal Service, has launched a Whistleblower Rewards Program to combat antitrust crimes. Following the DOJ Criminal Division’s launch of a whistleblower pilot program last year,1 the Antitrust Division is now offering a reward to whistleblowers. Under the new program, individuals who report credible and timely evidence of antitrust collusion—such as price-fixing or bid-rigging and certain monopolization cases—may receive up to 30% of recovered criminal fines. This marks a significant step in expanding detection tools for antitrust violations, with reports to be submitted through a dedicated DOJ webpage.


Contents

Key takeaways

  • The Whistleblower Rewards Program marks a major enforcement shift by offering financial incentives for reporting potential antitrust crimes. 
  • The program is designed to encourage people to come forward with credible information that can help enforce antitrust laws.
  • It expands the DOJ’s toolkit for detecting collusive conduct like price-fixing and bid-rigging, while reinforcing interagency coordination with the U.S. Postal Service Inspection Service and the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General (USPS OIG). 
  • By enabling individuals to report directly and potentially receive up to 30% of fines collected, the program may strengthen deterrence across multiple industries— including industries where the USPS procures goods and services either directly or indirectly. 
  • It also signals DOJ’s growing reliance on informant-led investigations to uncover and prosecute complex antitrust violations.

In more detail

The Whistleblower Rewards Program represents a significant development in antitrust enforcement, particularly in areas that are difficult to monitor, such as procurement. By offering financial incentives for individuals to provide “specific, credible, and timely information,” the program directly addresses the challenge of uncovering cartel activities, often conducted in manners difficult to detect. 

From a deterrent perspective, this shift alters the risk calculus for potential offenders. The policy implies that even the most covert conspiracies are susceptible to detection since individuals now have a financial incentive to disclose. For the Antitrust Division, this could result in earlier detection, higher-quality evidence, and more efficient investigations. 

Notwithstanding its potential, several considerations remain about the program's implementation and practical effectiveness. Its success hinges on how accessible and protective the reporting process is, and whether potential whistleblowers perceive the program as worth the risk. 

The program’s objective is said to “incentivize individuals and companies about collusive behavior without the fear of reprisal.” To support the program, the DOJ launched a dedicated Whistleblower Rewards Program webpage,2 and key information on antitrust crimes. Any award is subject to the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding3 (MOU) the Antitrust Division has with its law enforcement partners. 

The MOU establishes eligibility criteria, reporting instructions, outlining and defining limitations and conditions. If an individual voluntarily reports original information about antitrust violations that lead to at least $1 million in fines or recoveries, they may receive a reward. The Antitrust Division will ultimately have discretion on whether to grant the reward, “but if a whistleblower is eligible for an award the presumptive award amount will be between 15 and 30% of the amount of the criminal fine or recovery.”  

Further, this initiative aligns with broader global trends in competition law, emphasizing enforcers’ interests in proactive detection, leveraging informants, employing reward mechanisms, and building enforcement synergies. This heightens the stakes for those engaged or who may engage in collusion, signals a serious commitment by the Division, and has the potential to significantly enhance its enforcement scope and capabilities. 

Companies should expect more oversight and enforcement, underscoring the need for companies to enhance their compliance programs. This raises the stakes for compliance failures and increases the likelihood of investigations initiated through whistleblower tips. Companies should take this as a further incentive to strengthen internal controls, ensure their procurement practices are in compliance with antitrust laws, and reinforce a culture of compliance to mitigate any potential exposure and reputational harm.


1 United States: DOJ launches Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program - Baker McKenzie InsightPlus
2 www.justice.gov/atr/whistleblower-rewards
3 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the Whistleblower Rewards Program and Procedures Between the Antitrust Division United States Department of Justice and the United States Postal Service and the Office of Inspector General United States Postal Service

 



Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.