United States: Federal Trade Commission takes on employer non-compete clauses

In brief

Over the past week, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took a major step to expand competition policy deeper into labor markets.


On July 9, 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order on antitrust and competition policy that identified non-compete clauses as an area for greater scrutiny.[i] The Executive Order invited the FTC to use its “statutory rulemaking authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act to curtail the unfair use of non-compete clauses and other clauses or agreements that may unfairly limit worker mobility.”[ii]  This week, the FTC significantly advanced the Executive Order's directive: 

  • On January 5, 2023, the FTC voted 3-1 to propose a new rule that would significantly restrict the use of non-compete clauses between employers and employees.[iii] The FTC’s proposed rule represents the FTC’s first foray into Section 5 competition rulemaking under Chair Lina Khan. 
  • The proposed rule follows a set of enforcement actions taken by the FTC against non-compete covenants in certain employer contracts.  On January 4, 2023, just one day prior to announcing the proposed rule, the FTC voted 3-1 to issue proposed orders against two affiliated security guard companies (Prudential Security, Inc. and Prudential Command Inc.) and their owners and two glass-container companies (O-I Glass, Inc. and Ardagh Group S.A.).[iv] The FTC alleged that these companies employed non-compete clauses that restrict workers’ freedom to accept employment with a competing business, form a competing business, or compete with that employer in any other way.[v]

Click here to access full alert.

[i] Executive Office of the President, Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy (July 9, 2021), https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/07/09/executive-order-on-promoting-competition-in-the-american-economy/.
[ii] Id.
[iii] Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm’n, FTC Proposes Rule to Ban Noncompete Clauses, Which Hurt Workers and Harm Competition (Jan. 5, 2023), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/01/ftc-proposes-rule-ban-noncompete-clauses-which-hurt-workers-harm-competition. Chair Lina M. Khan, Commissioner Rebecca K. Slaughter, and Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya issued a majority statement on the proposed rule. Statement of Chair Lina M. Khan Joined by Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya, Regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Restrict Employers’ Use of Noncompete Clauses, Comm’n File No. P201200 (Jan. 5, 2023), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/statement-of-chair-lina-m-khan-joined-by-commrs-slaughter-and-bedoya-on-noncompete-nprm.pdf. Commissioners Slaughter and Bedoya filed a separate concurring statement. Statement of Commissioner Slaughter Joined by Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya, On the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Non-Compete Clauses, Comm’n File No. P201200 (Jan. 5, 2023), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/statement-of-commissioners-slaughter-and-bedoya-on-proposed-rulemaking-noncompete.pdf. Commissioner Wilson filed a dissenting statement. Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Christine S. Wilson Regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the Non-Compete Clause Rule, Comm’n File No. P201200-1 (Jan. 5, 2023), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/p201000noncompetewilsondissent.pdf.
[iv] Chair Lina M. Khan, Commissioner Rebecca K. Slaughter, and Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya issued a majority statement on these matters. Statement of Chair Lina M. Khan Joined by Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya In the Matters of Prudential Security, O-I Glass Inc., and Ardagh Group S.A. Commission File No. 2210026 & 2110182 (Jan. 4, 2023), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/21100262110182prudentialardaghkhanslaughterbedoyastatements.pdf; Commissioner Christine S. Wilson filed dissenting statements relating to both sets of proposed orders. Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Christine S. Wilson, In the Matter of Prudential Security, File No. 211-0026 (Jan. 4, 2023), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/wilson_dissenting_statement_-_prudential_security_-_final_-_1-3-23.pdf; Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Christine S. Wilson, In the Matter of O-I Glass, Inc. and In the Matter of Ardagh Group S.A., File No. 211-0182 (Jan. 4, 2023), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/wilson-dissenting-statement-glass-container-cases.pdf.
[v] Compl., In re Prudential Security, Inc., Dkt. No. C-XXXX at ¶ 1 (F.T.C. 2022); accord Compl., In re O-I Glass, Inc., Dkt. No. C- at ¶ 1 (F.T.C. 2022); Compl., In re Ardagh Group S.A., Dkt. No. C- at ¶ 1 (F.T.C. 2022).


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.