Vietnam: Asia Pacific competition highlights | Q1 2022

In brief

After surveying more than 2500 SMEs in Vietnam, the authority found that SMEs generally do not have a high level of awareness of the law. The regulator also published papers on the state of competition in two sectors. The annual report includes consolidated and published statistics by the VCCA and MOIT.

This update was published as part of our quarterly newsletter, Asia Pacific Competition Highlights. Click here to access the full report, which covers the most notable antitrust developments across nine Asia Pacific jurisdictions.


VCCA reports on competition law awareness of SMEs

The Vietnam Competition and Consumer Authority (VCCA) cooperated with Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) to conduct a survey of more than 2500 SMEs in Vietnam and has reported that SMEs generally do not have a high level of awareness:

  • 32.96% of surveyed SMEs had good awareness or higher, 50.7% of surveyed SMEs have average awareness, while 16.34% of SMEs have never heard of competition law.
  • 65.63% of enterprises were aware that the MOIT (VCCA) is the relevant competition regulator; 24.78% of enterprises did not know, while the remaining 9.59% gave the wrong answer.

The report also noted the impact of the pandemic on SMEs. Over 60.5% of SMEs had to shorten working hours. During the peak period of the pandemic in 2020-2021, factories had to suspend 50-80% of their employees and dismiss 10% of their employees.

More information can be found here.

VCCA reports on industrial real estate markets

The VCCA, in a report published in cooperation with JICA, found that the urea fertilizer market can be considered as a single product market:

  • the market is driven by the production process. Due to naturally high barriers for market entry, the urea fertilizer market has an oligopolistic structure, with market power held by the group of manufacturing enterprises
  • Vietnam has four domestic urea fertilizer factories with a total capacity of about 2,270 tons/year. Even with the lowest proportion of imports of all fertilizer groups, the majority of supply in the market comes from domestic production
  • In terms of wholesale supply, manufacturing enterprises mainly distribute urea fertilizer through two primary methods: (i) system of distributors/trade partners and (ii) distribution of products through its affiliated companies
  • In terms of retail supply, urea fertilizer retail markets are active with the participation of many suppliers and distributors nationwide.

The report also presents policy and legislative recommendations to state agencies:

  • A database should be established to monitor the urea fertilizer market. Due to the high level of concentration and direct impact on farming activities, it is vital to ensure a fair and equal competitive environment.
  • Competition law advocacy and awareness should be strengthened. Businesses should be mindful of high-risk provisions in agreements, including price-fixing, market allocation and prevention of market entry by other enterprises.

2021 report on Vietnam competition law published

The report includes consolidated and published statistics by the VCCA and MOIT.

Areas of focus for MOIT (Ministry of Industry and Trade) included the agreements to restrict competition in gas associations in some localities and in the fertilizer market; steel and hog price increase; the market of building materials to supply the construction investment project of highways on the North-South East route; advertisement showing signs of unfair competition for promoting functional foods, drugs, products with inflated features related to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Enterprises have continued to carry out M&A activities to restructure business activities or to cooperate with third parties to develop and expand. In 2021, the MOIT received and reviewed 130 notifications, nearly double 2020 figures:

  • over 70% of these transactions were conducted in Vietnam
  • 82% of notified transactions were acquisitions
  • 61% of notifications involved horizontal economic concentration between enterprises in the same relevant market.

Related alerts

Australia: Asia Pacific competition highlights | Q1 2022

China: Asia Pacific competition highlights | Q1 2022

Hong Kong: Asia Pacific competition highlights | Q1 2022

Indonesia: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights | Q1 2022

Japan: Asia Pacific Competition Highlights | Q1 2022

Singapore: Asia Pacific competition highlights | Q1 2022

Taiwan: Asia Pacific competition highlights | Q1 2022

Thailand: Asia Pacific competition highlights | Q1 2022

Vietnam: Asia Pacific competition highlights | Q1 2022

 

Contact Information

Copyright © 2022 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.