Australia: COVID-19 - Court relieves administrators of personal liability for rent

In brief

The Federal Court has made orders relieving the administrators of retailer Colette from personal liability for rent in response to the COVID-19 crisis and the current uncertainty in respect of government policy about rent relief for tenants: see Strawbridge (Administrator), in the matter of CBCH Group Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 2) [2020] FCA 472, a decision of Justice Markovic of 1 April 2020.


What you need to know

The decision shows that the Courts are willing to frame appropriate orders, using s447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and section 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations), to assist administrators of businesses forced into hibernation by the COVID 19 crisis avoid personal liability. 

This position will continue to evolve as governments announce and implement their plans in respect of commercial leasing arrangements in response to the COVID-19 crisis.

Why the administrators were allowed to avoid personal liability for rent

After their appointment on 31 January 2020, the administrators of the Colette Group elected to continue to trade 93 of its stores, and in February 2020 obtained orders extending the convening period for the second meeting of creditors through to June 2020 to enable a sale process to proceed. 

However, by 26 March 2020 the administrators formed the view it was in the interests of the health of employees and the communities in which they operated to close the stores. This was after a sales campaign had been undertaken, generating interest which had subsequently fallen away because of COVID-19 related market uncertainty. 

The administrators conducted modelling on different approaches to selling the business in light of those circumstances. They decided that the best course was to run a post COVID 19 sale, with a two month period of "mothballing", followed by a four week trading period in which the marketing process for the business would be resumed. To facilitate this, the administrators sought a complete reduction of rent from landlords, but were only able to achieve a total 9% reduction.

The court relieved the administrators from personal liability for a two week period whilst the physical, legal and economic landscape continues to evolve to respond to the impacts of COVID-19. It made a further order that the administrators were justified in not paying rent for those stores which the companies continued to occupy during that two week period.

Justice Markovic considered that the landlords would be in no worse a position than if the administrators abandoned the leases, whilst there was significant upside to creditors if the administrators’ plan achieved a better return on the sale of the business.

The matter is back before Justice Markovic on 15 April 2020, doubtless in anticipation that the state and territory governments will have progressed protections for commercial tenants by then.

Relief for tenants is coming in NSW and QLD

The Federal Government issued a National Cabinet Mandatory Code of Conduct: SME Commercial Leasing Principles During COVID 19 (Code), seeking to impose a set of "good faith leasing principles for application to commercial tenancies" where the tenant is a business with an annual group turnover of up to A$50m and is eligible for the Commonwealth "JobKeeper" stimulus package.  

The Code needs to be legislated in each of the Australian states and territories to have effect, which has not yet happened.

On 12 April 2020, the NSW Government announced a proposed package of protections and concessions for tenants and landlords including: 

  • a 6 month support package for residential tenants and landlords facing COVID-19 financial stress including an interim moratorium on applications for forced evictions due to rent arrears and an obligation for the parties to negotiate before a landlord can terminate a tenancy arrangement, with rent accruing as arrears during this process
  • A$440m to be provided in rent relief through land tax waivers or rebates of up to 25%, split between commercial and residential landlords, if the savings are passed on to tenants in COVID-19 financial distress 
  • legislation of the Code, including:
    • offering land tax concessions to commercial landlords who pass the savings through to tenants affected by COVID-19 by rent reductions; and
    • for businesses with turnover of less than A$50m that experience a COVID-19 related drop in revenue of at least 30%, restricting commercial landlords for terminating leases due to payment arrears and requiring rent relief proportionate to the decline in tenant turnover, with waivers to make up 50% of such rent relief and deferrals the balance. 

The package is yet to be legislated, and Parliament will be recalled for this purpose.

It is expected that the other states and territories will be implementing the Code and their raft of protections and concessions imminently, with Queensland having already announced their land tax relief package on 9 April 2020 and intent to move quickly to legislate the Code.  
 


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.