Indonesia: P2SK Law - new concepts for securitization and other financial innovations

In brief

This is the third in a series of client alerts in relation to Law No. 4/2023 on the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector ("P2SK Law"), dated 12 January 2023. You may access our previous client alerts in relation to the impact of the P2SK Law on the financial technology sector here and financing service businesses here.

The P2SK Law introduces the concept of financial instrument managers (badan pengelola instrumen keuangan - special purpose vehicle, "SPV") and trust fund managers (pengelola dana perwalian - "Trustee"). Both are designed as specific purpose entities licensed by Otoritas Jasa Keuangan ("OJK") and established to perform asset securitization and/or trustee fund management activities. The government expects the existence of SPVs to contribute to financial instrument diversification. Trustees, on the other hand, are regulated with the aim of increasing participation by financial market players and bringing about improvement in disclosure and good corporate governance regulations.



The P2SK Law is set to give the Indonesian financial industry a broader variety of securitization structure. Securitization of assets has long been acknowledged in Indonesia. Before the introduction of the P2SK Law, the only local structure for securitization of assets available was collective investment contracts for assets-backed securities (in Indonesian, EBA) (“CIC”), instead of having an SPV as the issuer. CIC, however, are not legal entities as other types of securitization issuer commonly used in other jurisdictions are. In 2005, we issued an article "Structuring asset-backed securities in Indonesia" in the DB Global Securitisation and Structured Finance Handbook explaining why the concept of CIC was created (instead of that of SPV), given issuing laws is not easy here. CIC are entered into between a licensed Indonesian investment manager and a licensed Indonesian custodian bank, where the investment manager is authorized to manage the portfolio investment, and the custodian bank is authorized to carry out the collective custody of the investment funds. But now, the P2SK Law has made the SPV available as a securitization vehicle.

As mentioned, while CIC have always been able to perform securitization over receivables (CIC can easily enter into a bilateral contract for receivables assignment without involving registration of ownership), CIC have their own limitations when it comes to performing securitization over assets with registered ownership (e.g., land), since CIC are not legal entities. Meanwhile, the SPV introduced by the P2SK Law are legal entities in the form of Indonesian limited liability companies (with certain special features, e.g., they can have one shareholder). They are designed to hold legal title over assets attributable to legal entities, such as land, allowing the SPV to not only use receivables as the underlying assets for securitization purposes, but also other forms of assets.

Similar to the bankruptcy remote characteristic that exist in CIC, the creation of SPV isolates the assets from financial risk and bankruptcy risk that are inherent to the originator. The P2SK Law makes it clear that if the originator becomes insolvent, its assets that have been transferred to the SPV will not form part of the bankruptcy assets (boedel pailit). As additional protection, the P2SK Law also makes it clear that an insolvency request over a Trustee and SPV can be only made by OJK.

With regard to the concept of Trustee,  we issued a client alert on a Bank Indonesia regulation on custodianship with management of assets (Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 14/17/PBI/2012) which introduced the term "trust". As we pointed out in that client alert here, technically the arrangements under PBI 14 are (only) based on an agency contract. Now, with the introduction of the concept of Trustee in a law, there would be an opportunity for OJK to look into aligning PBI 14 (now an OJK regulation, POJK No. 25/POJK.03/2016) with the Trustee concept under the P2SK Law. Details of the Trustee concept are expected to be introduced in implementing regulations.   


The opportunity to use the SPV and Trustee concepts for (new) business activities will depend on the implementing regulations of the P2SK Law, which are mandated to be issued within two years after the enactment of the P2SK Law. The P2SK Law also highlights that the implementing regulations will cover the tax treatment of Trustees and SPVs. The establishment of SPVs and Trustees is aimed at creating more room for financial innovations in Indonesia.

* * * * *

LOGO_Indonesia HHP Law Firm_Jakarta

© 2023 HHP Law Firm. All rights reserved. HHP Law Firm is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.