International: LIBOR transition - ARRC formally recommends Term SOFR

In brief

On 29 July 2021, the US Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) announced that it formally recommended the forward Term SOFR published by CME Group, Inc. (CME) for use in connection with business loans.

This announcement is significant for syndicated loans denominated in US Dollars for two principal reasons. First, the ARCC's recommendation of a Term SOFR is the first step in the waterfall in the ARRC's recommended LIBOR fallback language for loans and for many other financial products.1 Consequently, when a trigger event occurs, Term SOFR would become the LIBOR replacement in many loan agreements.

Second, Term SOFR likely will be extensively used in USD loan agreements going forward, since interest rate alternatives to USD LIBOR that are backward-looking have seen tepid acceptance. Term SOFR may also be seen as a competitor of certain forward-looking credit-sensitive rates (CSRs) that are available.2


Contents

In depth

The ARRC announcement followed a key step in the ARRC's "SOFR First" initiative, which was designed to increase liquidity in the SOFR swaps markets. As one of the principal steps of that initiative, on 26 July 2021, interdealer brokers began to replace trading of LIBOR linear swaps with the trading of SOFR linear swaps. The ARRC had said that if liquidity in SOFR swaps increased as they anticipated following this step, the ARRC would recommend Term SOFR for loans very soon thereafter. In fact, the ARRC recommendation occurred just three days later, on 29 July.

The ARRC's recommendation of Term SOFR completed the steps of its Paced Transition Plan. Since that plan was first adopted in 2017, it has listed approval of Term SOFR as its last step, specifying that such step would occur before the end of 2021, if sufficient liquidity in SOFR existed in the market to support such recommendation. 

Term SOFR is based on overnight SOFR, which is a risk-free rate (RFR), and does not reflect a premium for counterparty credit risk. Other versions of SOFR that have been suggested for loan agreements involve compounding in arrears (either compounding the rate or compounding the balance) or the daily calculation of interest in arrears, without compounding (e.g., Daily Simple SOFR). In contrast, Term SOFR is known in advance, at the time of borrowing, like LIBOR is now. Compounded SOFR in arrears and Daily Simple SOFR may still be used by borrowers and lenders if they choose.

Using a forward term rate for USD loans will result in a different market convention than in effect for Sterling loans, where the market convention is to use SONIA compounded in arrears.3

The ARRC recommendation allows loan agreements to use Term SOFR in place of LIBOR going forward, either as a replacement for LIBOR (whether pursuant to the operation of a fallback provision or otherwise) or in new deals. The ARRC has proposed loan conventions and use cases for Term SOFR. Notably, under the use cases, Term SOFR is not generally recommended for use in derivatives, with limited exceptions (including a hedge of a SOFR loan or other cash product). The limited use cases for Term SOFR reflect a concern that trading in Term SOFR may detract from liquidity in overnight SOFR, which would render that rate less robust.

Because Term SOFR and LIBOR are so conceptually similar, the ARCC believes that many loan agreement forms will not require extensive revision to substitute Term SOFR for LIBOR.4

However, the US bank regulators have stated that they will view the origination of new USD LIBOR deals after the end of 2021 as a safety and soundness risk. Despite this development, USD LIBOR for most tenors will continue to be quoted through 30 June 2023; LIBOR quotes for most other currency-tenor pairings will cease on 3 January 2022.

Certain CSRs have been used in the loan market instead of LIBOR, including Ameribor and BSBY.5 Term SOFR is not a CSR, and differs from LIBOR in that respect. While some lenders and borrowers may prefer a CSR to SOFR or Term SOFR going forward, many expect Term SOFR to be significantly used.

As noted above, Term SOFR is an RFR, since it is based on overnight SOFR. Lenders will likely add a credit spread adjustment to Term SOFR or reflect such an adjustment in the margin (which would therefore, all things be equal, be expected to be higher than the margin quoted for a LIBOR loan).

Please visit Baker McKenzie's LIBOR Transition Hub for further information concerning the LIBOR transition.


1 See, e.g., ARRC Supplemental Recommendations of Hardwired Fallback Language for LIBOR Syndicated and Bilateral Business Loans.

2 See our client alert Are Overnight Rates Overrated?

3 Although versions of term SONIA exist, UK regulators have put in place a limited use case of term SONIA in the UK loan market. See, e.g., The Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates, Use Cases of Benchmark Rates: Compounded in Arrears, Term Rate and Further Alternatives (January 2020); see also FICC Market Standards Board, Standard on use of Term SONIA reference rates.

4 See LSTA, Term SOFR Conventions: (Almost) Just Like LIBOR.

5 BSBY was severely criticized by Gary Gensler, the SEC chair. See Gensler, Prepared Remarks Before the Financial Stability Oversight Council, June 11, 2021. Bloomberg, which publishes BSBY, has published a paper in response: Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield Index BSBY report: Additional analysis and key facts.

Contact Information

Copyright © 2022 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.