International: Trade Finance Quarterly Insight | Issue 4 | June 2021

In brief

Welcome to the June edition of this quarterly. The first two articles of the edition examine some existing but increasingly useful and valuable tools that can be deployed in the world of trade financing to help parties navigate their way through the current uncertainty of a post-pandemic world. In the first article, we consider whether to ’trust or not to trust’ in the context of escrow arrangements, which are valuable tools in supply chain finance, to ensure both parties have absolute trust in their proposed contractual arrangement, where existing supply chains may be disrupted and companies are forced to transact with unknown (and thus untrusted) counterparties. In the second article, we explore how trade receivables securitisation may be an attractive option to companies seeking to maximise their balance sheets in the current climate. 


Contents

Also featured is an article that was first published in the May 2021 edition of Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, which examines the complete security package that is needed to ensure that a commodity financier is as well protected as they possibly can be. The backdrop to this article is the fact that COVID-19 lockdowns have disrupted commodity transactions and consequential enhanced oversight of borrowers’ businesses has uncovered fraudulent activities that have brought to the forefront weaknesses in arrangements that might otherwise have gone unnoticed or have been considered sufficiently low risk not to be a concern. In response prudent transaction parties may find themselves needing to revisit previously settled approaches to commodity finance security packages and perhaps adjusting where their cost benefit analysis falls.

The concluding article in this edition focuses on the intricate and very topical issue of diverging obligations between Western sanctions and Chinese national security laws that do not show any signs of relenting. The article sets the scene with the legal background before considering some of the strategies for navigating US and Chinese sanctions and related counter-measures.

Our regular Sanctions and Export Controls update page also features some interesting reads on, including amongst others, the Recast EU Dual-Use Regulation that is due to come in to force on 9 September 2021; the US Executive Order amending the ban on US persons purchasing securities of certain Chinese companies and the US revocation of Executive Orders banning certain Chinese software applications; and the EU Advocate-General’s opinion signalling a strict interpretation of the EU Blocking Regulation. There is also a link to the Baker McKenzie blog of the same title. 

Finally, we outline our exciting partnership with the LMA and our sponsorship of their Developing Markets Virtual Conference earlier this year. 

As always we hope that you enjoy this edition of Baker McKenzie’s Trade Finance Quarterly Insight and invite you to reach out to any of the contributors or indeed anyone else in the team (please see enclosed Key Contacts) should you wish to discuss any of the issues covered in this edition or have any other trade finance related queries. 

Download Trade Finance Quarterly
 


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.