United Kingdom: Financial Conduct Authority issues new guidance on market soundings

31 Oct 2023    2 minute read
FSR Market Watch Market Soundings Inside Information MAR Market Abuse Regulation

In brief

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued important new guidance on receipt of market soundings in the latest edition of Market Watch, the FCA's newsletter on market conduct issues.

The FCA's Market Watch 75 newsletter reminds buy-side firms (Market Sounding Recipients or MSRs) that they have an obligation to independently assess whether they possess inside information from a market sounding that would prohibit them from trading.

This is nothing new. One point that the FCA is particularly focused on, however, is what happens during the period following an issuer or sell-side firm (a Disclosing Market Participant or DMP) contacting the MSR to ask whether they consent to receive a market sounding and the point at which the MSR then places a trade in the issuer's securities.

Contents

The issue

  • The FCA has recently observed cases where MSRs have traded relevant financial instruments during the period after a DMP sought their consent to receive a sounding but before the DMP disclosed the inside information.
  • Even where DMPs did not initially disclose the identity of the financial instruments or the nature of the proposed transaction, MSRs were still able to identify those details using other information available to them.
  • Frequently, this has occurred where there has been a delay between DMPs requesting the MSR's consent to a sounding and the MSR giving it.
  • In these instances, MSRs have provided rationales that are not easily reconcilable with the circumstances of the trading. For example, an MSR selling a financial instrument immediately after a DMP has sought its consent to receive inside information and then buying the same quantity of the financial instrument back in the subsequent placing does not reconcile with 'Rebalancing a portfolio.'
  • The FCA's concern is that MSRs may, in practice, have other information available to them that allows them to identify, with reasonable confidence, the financial instruments referred to before they consent to receiving inside information, giving them an unfair advantage.

What firms can do

There are a few helpful points that come out of the newsletter:

  • At the point that a DMP asks whether an MSR consents to receiving a market sounding, the MSR must look at the information it already has on the issuer to determine whether it is now in receipt of inside information.
  • For example, when an issuer has previously held regular and similarly sized funding rounds executed by the same advisory firms or where an MSR holds a very small number of investments in its portfolio, the MSR might be able to identify the issuer.
  • MSRs should consider putting in place "Gatekeeper" arrangements, i.e., appointing specific teams or staff in Compliance as the first point of contact for DMPs – these arrangements are highlighted in Market Watch 51 and 58.
  • Staff who receive and process market soundings must be properly trained.
  • DMPs and MSRs should consider minimising time intervals between the DMP's initial communications and requests for consent and the MSRs consenting to such requests. Reducing this time period will help minimise the risks of insider dealing.
Contact Information
Caitlin McErlane
Partner
London
Read my Bio
caitlin.mcerlane@bakermckenzie.com

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.