United States: Private fund spotlight

Major developments for private fund managers (July-September 2025)

In brief

In this update, we take a high-level review of major issues faced by private fund managers investing across the globe. From July through September, US regulators introduced and revised several rules, with a particular focus on digital assets and retailization of private markets. There was also continued reversal or delays in effectiveness of various regulatory initiatives. Key enforcement actions during this period underscored increased scrutiny around valuation practices and fee calculations. These developments reflect a broader trend toward regulatory clarity in private fund operations, instituting the regulatory framework for digital assets, and a continued pullback from Biden-era regulatory initiatives.

Read more below.


Contents

July

August

  • New FBOT Registration Framework: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has issued an advisory on the registration framework for foreign boards of trade (FBOTs). The framework enables certain non-US exchanges, already subject to foreign regulatory oversight, to offer direct access to traders in the United States by registering with the CFTC as FBOTs instead of designated contract markets. Managers may soon be able to access a greater number of FBOTs, particularly digital asset platforms in foreign jurisdictions.
  • Management Fee Practices – Focused SEC Enforcement: The SEC recently settled with a middle market private equity fund adviser over breaches of fiduciary duty related to management fee offset calculations, including inadequate disclosure of interest on deferred transaction fees and improper duplication of transaction fee reductions. The adviser was charged with willful violations of Section 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and agreed to pay disgorgement and a civil penalty. Managers are encouraged to proactively review their fee calculation and disclosure practices to ensure compliance and avoid similar enforcement actions.

September

  • Regulatory Treatment of Foreign Private Issuers and Retail Investor Access: The SEC Investor Advisory Committee held panel discussions on potential reforms to the eligibility criteria and regulatory treatment of foreign private issuers, as well as draft recommendations regarding retail investor access to private market assets. Non-US managers should monitor future SEC updates regarding the regulatory treatment of non-US private issuers. Growth in the retailization of private markets may bring increased regulatory scrutiny in the future.
  • Criminally Liable Regulatory Offenses – Policy Statement on DOJ Referrals: The CFTC has issued a policy statement describing its plan to address criminally liable regulatory offenses, including a set of factors staff should consider when determining whether to refer potential violations to the DOJ, such as the harm caused, potential gain, the defendant’s expertise, knowledge of the unlawfulness of the conduct, recidivism, and whether the DOJ’s involvement would provide additional protection to market participants. The policy statement, along with the CFTC’s report anticipated by May 9, 2026, provides clarity on the types of regulatory offenses that may result in criminal liability.
  • SEC-CFTC Cross-Agency Crypto Initiative: The SEC and CFTC jointly announced a cross-agency initiative, building on the SEC’s Project Crypto and the CFTC’s Crypto Sprint, to coordinate efforts on enabling the trading of certain spot crypto asset products. They clarified that current law does not prohibit SEC- or CFTC-registered exchanges from facilitating trading in these products, and that the agencies’ collaboration aims to promote trading venue choices and optionality for US market participants. In a related development, Acting CFTC Chairman Pham recently outlined the US crypto roadmap, referencing the President’s Working Group recommendation that the SEC and CFTC: (i) facilitate digital asset trading at the federal level by offering clear regulatory guidance on key issues such as registration, custody, trading, and recordkeeping; and (ii) support the timely introduction of innovative financial products by leveraging tools like safe harbors and regulatory sandboxes. Key developments include: enactment of the GENIUS Act establishing a federal framework for stablecoins; the House’s passage of the CLARITY Act and other digital asset market structure bills; launch of the SEC’s Project Crypto and the CFTC’s Crypto Sprint, aimed at providing regulatory clarity for digital assets; and the CFTC’s issuance of a framework for registering and recognizing non-US exchanges and FBOTs. Digital asset regulation is coming and SEC and CFTC collaboration on the creation and implementation of crypto regulations may result in unexpected outcomes.
  • Delayed Implementation of Rules 10c-1a and 13f-2, Form SHO: The SEC Chairman has directed staff to address a US court of appeals’ opinion holding that the SEC had not properly considered the cumulative economic impact of Rule 10c-1a (reporting of securities loan), Rule 13f-2 (short position and short activity reporting by institutional investment managers), and related Form SHO. Stakeholders should monitor SEC updates and anticipate that implementation of these rules will be delayed or vacated.
  • SEC Policy Direction – Commitment to Clear Rules: As part of the SEC’s Project Crypto, Chairman Atkins affirmed that policy will now be set by clear and predictable rules rather than ad hoc enforcement actions. Clear and predictable rules are helpful in efficiently implementing new regulations; however, objective rules, rather than principles-based rules, can create difficulties in emerging or uncertain areas not contemplated by the objective standards.
  • CFTC Spring 2025 Unified Agenda: The CFTC reaffirmed its mission to promote market integrity and liquidity in the commodity derivatives markets, noting that the agency is working on addressing “unworkable Dodd-Frank rules and broad overreach.” The Agenda included rules covering topics such as event contracts, swap dealer business conduct standards, swap data recordkeeping and reporting, cross-border application of swap dealer requirements, block trade reporting, and margin requirements for uncleared swaps. Expect further rule amendments in the coming months ahead.

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.