Canada: CSA proposes updated expedited base shelf prospectus regime for well-known seasoned issuers

In brief

On 21 September 2023, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published a notice and request for comment regarding Proposed Amendments to National Instrument 44-102 Shelf Distributions Relating to Well-Known Seasoned Issuers and consequential amendments to other securities rules and policies (collectively, "Proposed Amendments").

The Proposed Amendments are intended to foster capital formation by reducing cost and regulatory burden for large, established reporting issuers that have a strong market following, complete disclosure records and sufficient public equity. They further refine the expedited base shelf prospectus regime that came into force on 4 January 2022 for "well-known seasoned issuers" (WKSIs).

The public comment period expires on 20 December 2023.


In response to the CSA's Consultation Paper 51-404 Considerations for Reducing Regulatory Burden for Non-Investment Fund Reporting Issuers and targeted consultations, market participants recommended implementing a WKSI regime, similar to that already existing in the United States, to alleviate the regulatory burden of certain prospectus requirements in the base shelf prospectus regime for specific large, established reporting issuers.

The CSA then published local blanket orders on 6 December 2021 (which came into effect on 4 January 2022), as set out in CSA Staff Notice 44-306 Blanket Orders Exempting Well-known Seasoned Issuers from Certain Prospectus Requirements (collectively, "Blanket Orders"), to provide temporary exemptions to "qualifying WKSIs" from certain base shelf prospectus requirements.

After re-evaluating the appropriateness of the eligibility criteria and considering further feedback from market participants, the CSA announced the Proposed Amendments which, if adopted, will replace the Blanket Orders.

Eligibility under the Proposed Amendments

To be eligible to file a WKSI base shelf prospectus, the issuer must, as of the date of filing the prospectus, be a WKSI that is an "eligible issuer". The Proposed Amendments are not applicable to an issuer that is an investment fund.

A WKSI is an issuer that on at least one day during the preceding 60 days: (i) had qualifying public equity of at least CAD 500 million or qualifying public debt of at least CAD 1 billion; (ii) is and has been a reporting issuer in a jurisdiction of Canada for the preceding three years; (iii) is qualified to file a short form prospectus; and (iv) meets certain other requirements.

To qualify as an "eligible issuer", the WKSI, during the preceding three years, must, among other things, have filed all periodic and timely disclosure documents and not have: ceased operations; become bankrupt; made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency; and/or been the subject of a cease trade order.

How the Proposed Amendments refine the Blanket Orders

Under the Proposed Amendments, a receipt would be deemed to be issued upon filing a WKSI base shelf prospectus and would be effective for a period of 37 months after its issuance. A preliminary prospectus would still not be required.

In addition, the WKSI base shelf prospectus may omit certain disclosure such as the aggregate dollar amount of securities being qualified and a plan of distribution. However, an issuer relying on the WKSI regime would be required annually to confirm its qualifications as a WKSI. Failure to do so will result in the issuer having to withdraw the WKSI base shelf prospectus and issue a news release announcing that it will no longer distribute securities under a prospectus supplement to the WKSI base shelf prospectus.

Changes the Proposed Amendments make to the Blanket Orders include the following:

  • Increased seasoning period - The WKSI must have been a reporting issuer for three years (increased from one year under the Blanket Orders).
  • More streamlined filing process - The WKSI must file a qualification certificate and disclose, within the WKSI base shelf prospectus, the issuer's reliance on the WKSI rules and the amount of its qualifying public equity/debt. In comparison, the Blanket Orders require issuers to file a letter stating reliance on the Blanket Orders, certain historical disclosure regarding its securities and certification regarding certain compliance matters.
  • Immediate launching and pricing of offerings - With the deemed prospectus receipt under the Proposed Amendments, there would be no regulatory review of the WKSI base shelf prospectus and no prior review of the Personal Information Forms (PIFs) required to be delivered with the WKSI base shelf prospectus. Thus, launching and pricing of an offering could occur immediately.
  • Additional regulatory burden reduction - The Proposed Amendments extend the receipt effectiveness period to a maximum of 37 months (from 25 months) if supported by an annual confirmation.
  • Greater fact-specific assessment of WKSI eligibility - The Proposed Amendments provide opportunity for applications for exemptive relief which may accommodate issuers that do not strictly fall within the eligibility requirements.


The Proposed Amendments are intended to: (i) increase certainty in transaction timing for issuers filing WKSI base shelf prospectuses; (ii) make capital raising more cost-efficient by streamlining and expediting the filing process; (iii) create greater consistency between the Canadian and American WKSI regimes which may enhance the efficiency and number of cross-border offerings; and (iv) address the concern of certain market participants that streamlining the filing process as prescribed by the Blanket Orders may result in issuers without a sufficient continuous disclosure record, market following and/or history of capital market participation being able to participate in the WKSI regime.

The CSA specifically requests comments regarding the WKSI qualification criteria in the definition of "well-known seasoned issuer", duration of the three-year seasoning period, eligibility criteria, eligibility exclusions and timing of delivery of PIFS with the base shelf prospectus. Since the Proposed Amendments prescribe more restrictive eligibility requirements, we welcome the availability of applications for exemptive relief to better reduce the unnecessary regulatory burden for certain large, established issuers.

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.