United Kingdom: UK listing regime - From the old economy to the new

08 Mar 2021    3 minute read
Capital Markets

In brief

A wide-ranging review of the UK Listing Regime by Lord Hill was published on 3 March (click here for a copy), timed neatly to coincide with the Budget. The aim is to radically improve the competitiveness of UK as a listing venue and is part of Rishi Sunak's Big Bang 2.0 for the City. Some of the proposed rule changes would require primary legislation by the Government and the current timeframe for that is uncertain. However, a large number of the key recommendations are aimed at the FCA and the FCA has stated that, subject to consultation feedback and FCA Board approval, it will seek to make relevant rule changes by late 2021.

Contents

Comment

It is an open secret that the UK has fallen well behind other listing locations such as Singapore, Hong Kong and the US, accounting for only 5% of global IPOs between 2015 and 2020. The aim of the Hill recommendations is to redress that balance and make the UK an attractive place to list, with a particular focus on companies that are part of the new economy - fintech, biotech and founder-led businesses - and facilitating SPACs.

We think that the implementation of these recommendations by the FCA and the Government will be a positive move and will be well received by the market.

In depth

In summary, Lord Hill's key recommendations on amendments to the UK listing regime are to:

  • Allow dual-class share structures in the LSE's premium listing segment, thereby allowing directors (in particular, founders) to have enhanced voting rights on certain decisions, with the following safeguards to maintain high corporate governance standards: (i) a maximum duration of five years; (ii) a maximum weighted voting ratio of 20:1; (iii) a requirement that a holder of B class shares be a company director; (iv) voting matters being limited to ensuring the holder is able to: (1) continue as a director; and (2) block a change of control of the company while the dual class share structure is in force; and (v) limitations on the transfer of the B class shares.
  • Reduce free float requirements (from 25% to 15%) and allow companies to use other measures to demonstrate liquidity (for large cap companies this could be demonstrating that they have a minimum: (i) number of shareholders; (ii) number of publicly held shares: (iii) market value of publicly held shares; and (iv) share price to support a liquid market, and for smaller cap companies this could be having in place an agreement with an FCA authorised broker to use its best endeavours to find matching business if there is no registered market maker on the relevant market). The current definition of "shares in public hands" should be reviewed. Updates could include increasing the threshold above which investment managers and institutional investors are excluded from contributing towards the free float (from 5% to 10%).
  • Liberalise the rules regarding SPACs by revising the Listing Rules that can require trading in the shares of a SPAC to be suspended on the announcement of a potential acquisition, whilst also providing additional protections for investors at the time of the acquisition, such as a shareholder vote on whether or not to make the acquisition and a right to redeem their initial investment prior to the completion of the acquisition.
  • Facilitate forward-looking information provision by issuers in prospectuses by amending the director and issuer liability regime.
  • Amend the premium listing requirement for historical financial information to cover at least 75% of an issuer’s business so that it only applies to the most recent financial period within the three-year track record.
  • Broaden the revenue earning relaxations currently applicable to scientific research-based companies to cover a wider range of high growth, innovative companies across a variety of sectors.
  • Review the FCA COBs rules relating to the inclusion of unconnected research analysts in an IPO process, which in practice mean an extra seven days being added to the public phase of the process.
  • Review the rules regarding further capital raisings with a view to facilitating a quicker and more efficient process of raising capital for existing listed companies and more easily involving retail investors.
  • Empower retail investors by considering how technology can be used to improve retail investor involvement in corporate actions and their undertaking of an appropriate stewardship role.
  • Review the prospectus regime, including considering: (i) treating admission to a regulated market and offers to the public separately; (ii) amending the prospectus exemption rules (iii) using alternative documentation, where appropriate and possible; (iv) whether prospectuses drawn up under other jurisdictions’ rules can be used to meet UK requirements.
  • Rebrand and reposition the LSE’s standard listing segment to increase its appeal to companies of all sizes and types.
Contact Information
Helen Bradley
Partner
London
helen.bradley@bakermckenzie.com
Megan Schellinger
Partner
London
megan.schellinger@bakermckenzie.com
James Thompson
Partner
London
james.thompson@bakermckenzie.com

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.