Australia: Unfair terms penalties countdown - From 9 November 2023 prohibitions for unfair contract terms commence

From 9 November 2023, penalties will apply for unfair contract terms

In brief

From 9 November 2023, the unfair terms regime will change so that significant penalties may apply for breaches of the UCT regime. As a result, businesses need to look again at their standard terms for unfair terms risks.


Contents

The Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022 ("Act"), which was passed in 2022, relevantly:

  • Introduced new civil penalty provisions prohibiting the use of and reliance on unfair contract terms (UCT's) in standard form contracts (previously the impact was that the offending clauses were only rendered void, without penalty)
  • Increased the maximum penalties that may be awarded for breaches of the civil penalty provisions in Parts IV, IVBA, X and XICA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) and under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), including the UCT regime to the greater of:
    • AUD 50 million
    • If the court can determine the value of the benefit obtained — three times the value of that benefit
    • If the court cannot determine the value of the benefit obtained — 30% of the body corporate’s adjusted turnover during the breach turnover period for the offence, act or omission

So as to enable industry to make any necessary changes to the applicable standard form contracts, the changes to the UCT regime did not commence for a period of 12 months following the Act receiving Royal Assent. The amended UCT regime will apply to standard form contracts that are made or renewed at or after the commencement date or on 9 November 2023.

The increased pecuniary penalties for breaches of the ACL have applied since 10 November 2022.

This alert is an update to our earlier alert when the Bill was passed, providing an overview of the key changes and highlighting important considerations for businesses.

Key takeaways

Given the 9 November 2023 start of the UCT changes, business should be identifying all commercial partners who may fall within the new definitions of "small business" and also carefully reviewing its standard form contracts with small businesses and consumers for potential unfair terms. The risks of not doing so are obvious and very significant - we expect that the regulators will closely look at potential contraventions and will not hesitate to take action in appropriate cases given the year long period that businesses have had to prepare.

The review that must now be undertaken of standard form contracts will be significantly different to the review that businesses undertook when the UCT regime was originally introduced. This is because the risk analysis has fundamentally changed – it is no longer possible to leave a 'borderline' unfair term in a contract on the basis that if unfair it will only be void and unenforceable – now that same term if unfair will be illegal and will expose the relevant business to the risk of substantial penalties.

The significant increases in penalties for breaches of the consumer law and for anti-competitive conduct also greatly increase the risks to business. Whilst we do not anticipate that the courts will immediately impose penalties that are five times the current level, the new UCT regime will provide the courts substantial discretion to order very large penalties in the most serious of cases.  

The new UCT regime

Under the pre–November 2023 UCT regime, a term contained in a consumer contract or small business contract will be void (i.e., not binding on the parties) where the term is unfair and the contract is ‘standard form.’  No penalties applied. 

From November 2023, two new UCT prohibitions apply where a party:

  1. Proposes an unfair term in a standard form consumer or small business contract which the party has entered into
  2. Uses, applies, or relies on (or purports to use, apply to rely on), an unfair contract term in a standard form consumer or small business contract

A business may breach these prohibitions multiple times in relation to the same contract term. For example, a separate contravention will arise for each instance that a UCT is applied or relied on, and each UCT will be considered a separate contravention.

The terms “applies, or relies on” mean to give effect to, or seek to enforce, an unfair term of a contract. It will be possible for multiple contraventions to arise in relation to the same contract or unfair term of a contract if a party applies or relies on multiple unfair terms or an unfair term on multiple occasions.

Expanded 'small business' scope of the UCT regime

The application of the UCT regime will also be significantly expanded from November 2023, and will include standard form contracts where one party to the contract is a business that:

  • Employs fewer than 100 employees (increased from the current limit of 20 employees)
  • Has a turnover of less than AUD 10 million (in the last financial year)

These changes have removed the upfront contract value threshold, which can sometimes be difficult to determine.

Broader remedies

The current automatic voiding provisions continue to apply, but from November 2023, the new UCT regime will broaden the court's powers to respond to breaches of the UCT regime.

These include:

  • The introduction of pecuniary penalties for breaches of the UCT regime. This will align the UCT regime with other contraventions of the ACL and the new maximum penalties set out above will apply.
  • Orders to void, vary or refuse to enforce part or all of a contract if the Court considers it appropriate to prevent or reduce loss or damage that may be caused from the contravention. This differs from the current test which requires that loss or damage has occurred or is likely to occur.
  • On application by the ACCC, orders relating to terms that are the same or substantially similar to a term that has been declared as unfair, can also apply to non-parties (both consumers and small businesses). For example, the Court may make orders preventing terms from being included in any future contracts, or may make orders to prevent or reduce loss or damage that may be caused by these terms, or prevent a person from including, applying or relying on these terms in other contracts captured by the UCT regime.

These remedies will significantly expand the scope of intervention available to Courts in relation to the UCT regime. The introduction of penalties is a very significant change to the current regime and, with the recent changes to the maximum penalties, means that there is now a risk of significant penalties being imposed for unfair contract terms in consumer or small business contracts.

Clarifying the UCT regime

The Act also includes the following changes to the UCT regime, clarifying various aspects of the existing regime:

  • Standard form contract. When determining whether a contract is "standard form", the Courts will need to consider whether the party has used the same or a similar contract previously. This goes to the concept of repeat usage.
  • Effective opportunity to negotiate. When considering whether a party has had an effective opportunity to negotiate, the Court will disregard whether the party had an opportunity to negotiate minor or insubstantial changes to terms in the contract or was able to select a term from a range of pre-determined options, and the extent to which a party to a similar contract was given an effective opportunity to negotiate.
  • Minimum standards provisions excluded. The changes in law clarify that the UCT regime does not apply to certain terms that are read into a contract by operation of a Commonwealth, State or Territory law (for example, some tenancy protections may be implied by law).
  • Certain categories of contract will be excluded from the UCT regime under the ACL:
    • The operating rules of licensed financial markets
    • The operating rules of licensed clearing and settlement facilities
    • Certain life insurance contracts
    • Real time gross settlement systems approved as payment and settlement systems by the RBA

Similar obligations exist regarding unfair contract terms for certain financial products and services under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001.

Application of the new UCT regime

As noted above, businesses were given 12 months to make any necessary changes with the amended UCT regime commencing on 9 November 2023. 

The new UCT regime will apply to:

  • New standard form contracts that are made at or after 9 November 2023
  • A renewed contract on and from the day on which the renewal takes effect
  • A term of a contract varied after 9 November 2023 (If there has not already been a renewal of the contract, the new regime will apply only to the term or terms that have been varied, on and from the day on which the variation takes effect, and as if the contract as varied had been made on the variation day.)

For advice and assistance in navigating these changes, please contact one of our experts.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.