Indonesia: Indonesian Government is proposing to impose excise on sugar-sweetened beverages

In brief

The consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (Minuman Berpemanis Dalam Kemasan or MBDK) in Indonesia has risen significantly in the past 20 years, making Indonesia the third highest consumer of MBDK in Southeast Asia in 2020.1 The high MBDK consumption may have numerous health implications (e.g., diabetes, obesity, liver and kidney damage, heart disease) that will significantly impact Indonesia's health and social and economic development.

In more detail 

To deal with this issue, Indonesian government has included excise revenue from MBDK in this year's State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara or APBN). This is because the government deemed that MBDK can qualify as excisable goods. Although it has been stipulated in the APBN, excise on MBDK has not yet been implemented.

In line with the explanation above, the Minister of Finance (MOF) along with Commission IX of the Indonesian House of Representatives (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat or DPR) has agreed to impose excise on MBDK and will issue a regulation or decree on this matter. However, the Director General of Customs and Excise confirmed that the excise on MBDK is expected to take effect next year, considering Indonesia's current economic condition, which is starting to recover after the COVID-19 pandemic.2 There is also no further confirmation from the MOF when this policy will actually be implemented.

Overview of excise revenue in APBN

Under APBN 2021, the government targeted state excise revenue of IDR 180 trillion. This year, the target has risen to around IDR 203 trillion. The following table shows the increase for different categories of products:



Excise Allocation

Target Revenue

APBN 2021

APBN 2022



Excise from tobacco products

Around IDR 173 trillion


Around IDR 194 trillion


Excise from ethyl alcohol or ethanol

Around IDR 156 billion

IDR 190 billion


Excise from drinks containing ethyl alcohol

Around IDR 5 billion

IDR 6.8 billion


Excise from plastics

IDR 500 billion

IDR 1.9 trillion

Excise from MBDK - IDR 1.5 trillion


We can see that the excise revenue in APBN 2021 had only four income sources, namely tobacco products, ethyl alcohol or ethanol, drinks containing ethyl alcohol, and plastics. Tobacco products contributed greatly to last year's excise revenue, accounting for 96.5% of the total excise revenue.

APBN 2022 contains a new source of excise revenue. The financial notes of APBN 2022 specify that the addition of excise revenue on MBDK is a part of Indonesia's fiscal policy to increase and optimalize the state's income. However, those notes do not explain what underlies the imposition of excise on MBDK (i.e., the purposes and objectives of imposing excise on MBDK). Because the Director of Customs and Excise has just confirmed that the excise duty on MBDK will not be imposed this year, surely this year's target on excise revenue from MBDK will not be reached.

MBDK excise imposition 

According to the Center for Indonesia's Strategic Development Initiatives (CISDI), MBDK has met the excisable goods requirements, namely (i) its consumption needs to be controlled, (ii) its distribution needs to be supervised, (iii) its use may have a negative impact on the public or the environment,  and (iv) its use requires the imposition of state levies, and therefore excise should be imposed on MBDK.3

CISDI believes that the restriction of MBDK consumption through excise policy and marketing arrangements, and limiting MBDK availability in public places may make a significant contribution to overcoming health problems in Indonesia.4 The government also plays a big role in controlling MBDK distribution through the prevailing law.

In June 2022, the MOF along with Commission IX of the DPR agreed to add several categories of excisable goods, one of which is MBDK. The MOF explained that the imposition of MBDK excise is in accordance with Indonesia's financial reform. MBDK excise is also a form of implementing Indonesia's harmonization tax law.5

Although CISDI recommends that the government impose an MBDK excise tariff of 20%,6 the MOF explained that the excise tariff on MBDK will depend on the sugar and artificial sweetener contents. The tariff will increase if the content of sugar or artificial sweeteneer in a product is higher.7

Until now, there is no information on when the MBDK excise will be implemented, but it is likely take into effect next year as stated by the Director of Customs and Excise.

The impact of MBDK excise

Based on CISDI's research, MBDK excise is a cost-effective fiscal instrument to (i) reduce MBDK consumption, (ii) educate the public on the importance of reducing MBDK consumption, (iii) contribute substantively to the state's income and (iv) contribute to the long-term improvement of public health.8 MBDK excise imposition is also considered as an incentive for food and beverage businesses to reformulate their products by reducing the sugar content and promoting alternatives to low-sugar products.

The Deputy Chair of Commission IX of the DPR explained that the imposition of MBDK excise could increase the state's revenue optimally. The funds collected from this excise will be used to handle the impact of MBDK consumption.9 For instance, the MBDK excise revenue has the potential to cover the Healthcare and Social Security Agency (Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan or "BPJS Kesehatan") payment deficit, especially due to the high medical costs caused by obesity, diabetes and other non-communicable disease.10

On the other hand, MBDK excise may harm Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah or UMKM). The implementation of MBDK excise may cause an increase in production and logistics costs that will reduce consumer demand, resulting in significant losses for business actors. The government needs to take this into account considering that UMKM in Indonesia are still struggling to recover after the COVID-19 pandemic.11

As seen above, the imposition of excise on MBDK in Indonesia has its pros and cons. The government needs to carry out more comprehensive research on this, by not only considering the views of competent authorities, but also those of the relevant business actors, with the aim of implementing MBDK excise optimally.

1 Gita Kusnadi,, Ringkasan Kebijakan: Urgensi Implementasi Kebijakan Cukai Minuman Berpemanis Dalam Kemasan (MBDK) di Indonesia, (CISDI: Jakarta, 2022), pg. 2.

2 Kompas,, Kontan,

3 Gita Kusnadi,, Ringkasan Kebijakan… pg. 6.

4 Gita Kusnadi,, Ringkasan Kebijakan… pg. 2.

5 Ekonomi Bisnis,,

6 Gita Kusnadi,, Ringkasan Kebijakan… pg. 11.

7 Legal Centric,

8 Gita Kusnadi,, Ringkasan Kebijakan… pg. 11.

9 Ekonomi Bisnis.,

10 Gita Kusnadi,, Ringkasan Kebijakan… pg. 9.

11 The Indonesia Institute, .


LOGO_Indonesia HHP Law Firm_Jakarta

© 2022 HHP Law Firm. All rights reserved. HHP Law Firm is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Copyright © 2023 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.