Singapore: CCS issues warning following misrepresentation of industry standards and fabricated reviews

In brief

On 20 November 2025, the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCS) reported taking action against the former and current owners of a mattress-retailing platform after it used misleading statements indicating that products attained certain official industry standards and positive Trustpilot reviews.

Following investigations, the business owner of the mattress retailer agreed with the CCS to remove the misleading logos and the Trustpilot reviews.


Contents

In more detail

After receiving a complaint about misleading marketing practices by mattress sellers, the CCS launched its investigations into a mattress retailer that displayed logos on its website and online platforms with statements such as “Hotelier Standard For Excellence” and “Hospitality Standards,” despite no such official standards existing.

A 4.5-star Trustpilot rating was also displayed on the online platforms, but there was no active Trustpilot account for the mattress retailer and the displayed rating was based primarily on reviews that the business had written itself.

It was found that the logos and the Trustpilot rating had been initially created and displayed by the retailer’s former owner, and the brand was sold to the present business owner in January 2025. The present business owner was aware of the logos and the Trustpilot rating, but did not check their veracity after acquiring the brand and continued to display them.

The current business owner agreed with the CCS to remove the misleading logos and the Trustpilot reviews. The CCS also issued a warning to the former business owner for initiating the conduct.

Key takeaways

This case demonstrates Singapore’s continued strict enforcement against cases of unfair trade practices and false or misleading advertisements. The CCS is empowered under the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act 2003 to investigate the use of misleading or false quality-related claims that may amount to unfair practices, and may also initiate court proceedings to restrict businesses from continuing such unfair practices or to make a declaration that the company is engaging in an unfair practice, and enter into a voluntary compliance agreement with the company, where the company would agree not to engage in the unfair practice, among other terms.

This enforcement report follows the CCS’ recent issuing of its Guide on Quality-related Claims, which indicates the CCS’ active enforcement.

* * * * *

LOGO_Wong&Leow_Singapore

© 2025 Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow is incorporated with limited liability and is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a global law firm with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "principal" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.