United States and Brazil: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Enforcement - Increased actions against imports from Brazil

In brief

Brazil as a Target for US Duties - What Producers Should Know

The United States is one of the most active countries in investigating so-called "unfair pricing" in the form of dumping or subsidization by foreign countries.  In the past three years, the United States has initiated five investigations against imports from Brazil, having very recently initiated a case involving brass rods.  Brazilian producers/exporters should be aware of the US activity in the antidumping and anti-subsidy space and, where there is a risk of such an action targeting a company's exports from Brazil to the United States, consider taking steps to prepare in advance and implement a global trade remedies compliance, prevention, and action strategy.


Contents

US Actions Against Brazilian Imports

The US Commerce Department and US International Trade Commission have the authority to investigate allegations that imports into the United States are entering at prices below cost or with the benefit of countervailable government subsidies.  Antidumping and countervailing duty orders are country, producer and product specific, which means that they apply to the products identified by the complaining US producers of the same goods, and only from the subject country.  If these duties are imposed, then they apply for a minimum of five years, meaning that producers/exporters to the United States, US importers, and customers will have to account for such duties into their supply chains. These duties can be set at specific (lower), individual levels for those producers/exporters that cooperate with the investigation conducted by US authorities.

The United States has recently investigated exports from Brazil of manufactured raw materials, such as common aluminum alloy sheets and aluminum foil, along with agricultural products such as lemon juice and raw honey.  The resulting additional duties imposed by these investigations have ranged from about 8% to 50%, which can be devastating to US importers who are legally responsible for paying the cash deposits for covered imports upon entry, and to Brazilian producers/exporters, who lose competitiveness in or even access to the large US market.  In the brass rods investigation initiated a few days ago, the petitioners alleged a 62.6% dumping margin for exports from Brazil.

Be Prepared for Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Investigations

There are ways to proactively prepare for an investigation by the United States, and given the potential disruption to shipping activity, these actions are well worth considering.

First, Brazilian producers that routinely export to the United States should constantly assess their pricing practices so that sales are not made below the cost of production plus expenses and a profit, and also compare the export prices to the United States with their local sales prices.

Second, Brazilian producers/exporters should maintain a comparison database that allows for the assessment of price comparisons across markets.

Third, constantly monitoring publications by the US Commerce Department and US International Trade Commission is a must to ensure awareness of newly-filed petitions. Where new petitions are filed, quick action must be taken to decide on participation: as mentioned above, a timely and full cooperation with the US investigations may result in a company securing an individualized duty rate that may be significantly lower than the margins for companies that do not cooperate or do not secure an individual duty rate. A favorable rate can serve as a competitive advantage after an order is issued.  In other words: if a Brazilian producer cooperates and achieves a reduced, individualized rate, it may have improved access to the US market for at least five years after the imposition of antidumping and/or countervailing duties, given that other exporters will face higher duties to be paid by customers.

As noted, over the past three years there have been four cases generating antidumping duty orders against imports from Brazil.  The products subject to these recent orders are common alloy aluminum sheet, aluminum foil, raw honey, and lemon juice.  The duty margins found in these cases are illustrated below.  As mentioned above, a new case involving brass rods from Brazil has just been initiated.

Brasil US alert

 

In view of Baker McKenzie's global reach, which includes strategic cooperation with Trench Rossi Watanabe in Brazil, we can help producers with a global antidumping and countervailing duty strategy that allows a company to leverage domestic trade policy in all major markets.  Our team of professionals is available to discuss questions regarding US investigations or investigations in all main jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, the European Union, China, and Japan.  For more information, please visit our Trade Remedies homepage.

* * * * *

LOGO_TrenchRossiWatanabe_Brazil

Trench Rossi Watanabe and Baker McKenzie have executed a strategic cooperation agreement for consulting on foreign law.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.