United States: Electronic shelf labels pose myriad risks for retailers

In brief

Retailers are increasingly adopting electronic shelf labels (ESLs) to streamline pricing updates and enhance operational efficiency. ESLs offer quick price adjustments, improved accuracy, and reduced labor. However, concerns about price gouging, demographic-based pricing, and technical glitches have emerged. Lawmakers and regulators are scrutinizing the technology, emphasizing the need for businesses to consider legal risks before deployment.


Contents

Recommended actions

While the use of ESLs offers retailers innovative ways to engage with customers, businesses must take precautions to avoid legal liability or reputational harm. We recommend developing a set of internal guidelines for ESL usage that address both general and sector-specific risks. Clear communication with consumers and regulators about these guidelines is crucial.

  1. Given that ESL-related liability can arise from various legal areas such as antitrust, data privacy, antidiscrimination, consumer protection, and more, businesses should thoroughly assess and mitigate these diverse risks. This can be achieved by establishing an internal risk framework or conducting an impact assessment around the tool and the data collected before deploying ESL features.
  2. Businesses should evaluate whether their use of ESLs, in conjunction with dynamic pricing, could result in price gouging, bias, price collusion, or price-fixing. If these risks are identified, it is crucial to implement guardrails and organizational processes to ensure that pricing practices remain fair and compliant with relevant laws.
  3. Businesses should exercise special caution when implementing ESL implementations combined with AI and facial recognition technologies. These features should be assessed rigorously to ensure that they don't result in discrimination or bias.

Background

Retailers are progressively adopting ESLs to simplify pricing updates and boost operational efficiency. These digital displays, which can be updated remotely, allow businesses to respond quickly to fluctuating costs, improve pricing accuracy, and reduce labor-intensive tasks. As the technology becomes more widespread, it is changing the way consumers interact with prices and how businesses use remote technologies to engage with consumers in real time.

Despite the benefits, the potential for misuse of ESLs has attracted the attention of US policymakers and consumer advocates. Critics worry about dynamic pricing leading to price gouging and the use of facial recognition technology to target pricing based on consumer demographics. Technical issues have also caused some retailers to close stores due to incorrect pricing displays. Businesses considering ESL deployment should carefully assess these risks and implement internal guidelines to mitigate potential legal liabilities.

To learn more, read our full article published on Law360, where we delve into retailers' adoption of ELS and examine the associated legal and regulatory risks.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.