Europe: Guidelines on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR

In brief

The European Data Protection Board ("EDPB") has published draft guidelines on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR ("Guidelines"). They replace the previous guidelines on the concepts of controllers and processors which the Art. 29 Working Party, i.e. basically the EDPB's predecessor, had published in 2010. The Guidelines are open for public consultation until October 19, 2020, after which the final version will be issued.

In its comprehensive Guidelines (45 pages), the EDPB not only provides guidance on the concepts of controllers, processors and joint controllers, but also long-anticipated guidance on data processing agreements pursuant to Art. 28 GDPR. We have summarized the key aspects of the Guidelines below:
 


Contents

Summary

  • The criteria leading to the qualification as a controller or a processor have remained unchanged considering the guidelines of the Art. 29 Working Party on controller and processor under the previous EU Data Protection Directive. 
  • For data processing agreements, it shall not be sufficient to recap the obligations in Art. 28 GDPR. Rather, the data processing agreement shall specify the obligations and the procedures between the controller and the processor to comply with those obligations. We, therefore, recommend reviewing any existing data processing agreements as well as templates and determining whether they should be updated in light of the Guidelines (at least once the Guidelines are final).
  • The EDPB provides further guidance on the criteria leading to a joint controllership, in particular: (a) the fact that one of the parties does not have access to personal data processed is not sufficient to exclude joint controllership, (b) joint responsibility does not necessarily imply equal responsibility of the various operators involved, and (c) joint controllership does not necessarily mean that entities need to have the same purpose, but that purposes which are closely linked or complementary may be sufficient. 
  • The Guidelines indicate that situations that so far have been qualified as a controller to processor relationship may now be qualified as joint controller relationships. Companies should consider whether certain controller-processor set-ups should be re-qualified and implemented as joint controller relationships, in particular in light of existing case law by the Court of Justice of the European 
  •  Union relating to certain website tools and sharing of website user data and other explicit examples provided by the EDPB in the Guidelines.

 Cilck here to access the full alert.


Copyright © 2022 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.