International: Electronic shelf labels – what it means for retail and consumer brands

Off the Shelf, the Baker McKenzie Consumer Goods & Retail Sector Group video podcast

In brief

Retailers are increasingly adopting electronic shelf labels (ESLs) to streamline pricing updates and improve operational efficiency. While ESLs offer clear advantages, such as real-time pricing and reduced labor costs, they also raise important concerns around price manipulation, discriminatory pricing, and technical reliability. These risks have prompted closer scrutiny from regulators and lawmakers, who urge businesses to carefully evaluate the legal implications before implementing the technology. The opportunities and risks around ESLs are also something brands need to consider and be alert to.

In our latest episode of the Off the Shelf podcast series, Michelle Heisner, Cynthia Cole, and Teisha Johnson unpack the evolving role of ESLs in retail. They discuss how the technology is reshaping pricing strategies and consumer engagement, while also highlighting the legal and ethical challenges it presents. Their conversation underscores the need for businesses, both retailers and brands, to proactively manage these risks through clear policies, regular oversight, and a strong understanding of the regulatory landscape.


Contents

In more detail

What are electronic shelf labels (ESLs)?

ESLs are digital displays that replace traditional paper price tags, allowing retailers to update pricing in real time via a wireless connection to a centralized system. Increasingly adopted by large retail chains, ESLs streamline pricing operations, reduce manual labor, and enable agile, dynamic pricing strategies.

ESLs offer a range of benefits: they enable rapid price adjustments, facilitate markdowns for near-expiry items, and display key product information such as allergens and ingredients. ESLs also help minimize pricing discrepancies across shelves, point-of-sale systems, and online listings, while supporting promotional campaigns and enhancing restocking efficiency.

Potential risks and considerations

ESLs are not without risks. Technical malfunctions have, in some instances, triggered widespread pricing errors—occasionally severe enough to prompt temporary store closures. These incidents underscore the need for robust implementation strategies and well-defined contingency plans.

Consumer protection risks

ESLs raise significant consumer protection concerns, particularly around pricing practices and transparency. One major issue is the potential for price gouging, where dynamic pricing capabilities could be used to inflate prices on essential goods during emergencies or periods of high demand. This mirrors concerns seen in other industries like travel and ridesharing. Moreover, the use of ESLs in conjunction with technologies such as facial recognition or AI-driven profiling could lead to discriminatory pricing based on perceived consumer demographics, such as age or gender. These practices may not only be unethical but could also violate consumer protection laws. Inaccurate or inconsistent ESL updates may further mislead consumers, exposing retailers and brands to liability under false advertising or unfair trade practices.

Privacy risks

The integration of ESLs with data collection technologies introduces serious privacy implications. Retailers may collect biometric data, such as facial scans, without obtaining proper consent, potentially violating biometric privacy laws. Even beyond biometric data, the broader collection and use of consumer information—such as shopping behavior or demographic profiling—raises questions about data security, transparency, and consent. If consumers are unaware of how their data is being used or shared, especially with third-party brands, this could lead to regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm.

Antitrust risks

From an antitrust perspective, ESLs present multiple challenges. The use of algorithmic pricing tools can result in pricing patterns that resemble collusion, especially if multiple retailers rely on the same or similar algorithms. This could trigger investigations by competition authorities. Furthermore, the high cost and technical complexity of ESL systems may create barriers for smaller retailers, leading to market consolidation and reduced competition. Such concentration of market power is a key concern for antitrust regulators like the FTC and DOJ, who warn that it can result in higher prices, limited consumer choice, and entrenched dominance by a few large players.

Brand risks

Brands may face reputational and legal risks when associated with ESL technologies. Inconsistent pricing across store locations due to ESL errors can undermine promotional strategies and damage consumer trust. If ESLs are used to implement discriminatory pricing or coordinate pricing across retailers, brands may be implicated in antitrust or consumer protection violations. Furthermore, any association with invasive data collection practices—especially those perceived as lacking transparency or consent—can erode brand equity and provoke backlash from both regulators and the public.

Conclusion

To minimize legal and reputational risks, businesses should implement clear internal guidelines for the use of ESLs and conduct regular audits to ensure compliance. Retailers and brands must also stay alert to evolving regulations, particularly in areas where enforcement gaps may exist. Monitoring how ESLs are deployed—especially in relation to consumer protection and antitrust laws—is essential to avoid unintended violations and regulatory scrutiny.

To learn more, read our full article published on Law360, where we delve into retailers' adoption of ELS and examine the associated legal and regulatory risks in more detail.

Contact Information

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.