• Login
    • Advanced search
    • Title
    • Channel
    • Module
  • Home
  • Client Solutions
    • Digital Transformation
    • Energy Transition
    • Supply Chains
    • Sustainability and ESG
    • Workforce Redesign
  • Sectors
    • Consumer Goods & Retail
    • Energy, Mining & Infrastructure
    • Financial Institutions
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
    • Industrials, Manufacturing & Transportation
    • Technology
  • Learning Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Video Chats
    • Webinars
  • Area of Law
    • Antitrust & Competition
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Banking & Finance
    • Capital Markets
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Data & Technology
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment & Compensation
    • Environment & Climate Change
    • Financial Services Regulatory
    • Inclusion, Diversity & Equity
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Commercial & Trade
    • Investigations, Compliance & Ethics
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Pensions
    • Private Equity
    • Projects
    • Real Estate
    • Restructuring & Insolvency
    • Tax
  • Location
    • International

    • International
    • Asia Pacific

    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Indonesia
    • Japan
    • Malaysia
    • Myanmar
    • South Korea (Korea, Republic of)
    • Singapore
    • Taipei
    • Thailand
    • Philippines
    • Vietnam
    • EMEA

    • Austria
    • Bahrain
    • Belgium
    • Czech Republic
    • Egypt
    • EU
    • France
    • Germany
    • Hungary
    • Italy
    • Kazakhstan
    • Luxembourg
    • Morocco
    • Netherlands
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Qatar
    • Russian Federation
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
    • Türkiye
    • Ukraine
    • United Arab Emirates
    • United Kingdom
    • North America

    • Canada
    • United States
    • Latin America

    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Colombia
    • Chile
    • Mexico
    • Peru
    • Venezuela
Baker McKenzie InsightPlus Home
      • Title
      • Channel
      • Module
    • Hit ENTER to search in content
    • Advanced search
    • Login
  • Home
  • Client Solutions
    • Digital Transformation
    • Energy Transition
    • Supply Chains
    • Sustainability and ESG
    • Workforce Redesign
  • Sectors
    • Consumer Goods & Retail
    • Energy, Mining & Infrastructure
    • Financial Institutions
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
    • Industrials, Manufacturing & Transportation
    • Technology
  • Learning Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Video Chats
    • Webinars
  • Area of Law
    • Antitrust & Competition
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Banking & Finance
    • Capital Markets
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Data & Technology
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment & Compensation
    • Environment & Climate Change
    • Financial Services Regulatory
    • Inclusion, Diversity & Equity
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Commercial & Trade
    • Investigations, Compliance & Ethics
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Pensions
    • Private Equity
    • Projects
    • Real Estate
    • Restructuring & Insolvency
    • Tax
  • Location
    • International

    • International
    • Asia Pacific

    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Indonesia
    • Japan
    • Malaysia
    • Myanmar
    • South Korea (Korea, Republic of)
    • Singapore
    • Taipei
    • Thailand
    • Philippines
    • Vietnam
    • EMEA

    • Austria
    • Bahrain
    • Belgium
    • Czech Republic
    • Egypt
    • EU
    • France
    • Germany
    • Hungary
    • Italy
    • Kazakhstan
    • Luxembourg
    • Morocco
    • Netherlands
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Qatar
    • Russian Federation
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
    • Türkiye
    • Ukraine
    • United Arab Emirates
    • United Kingdom
    • North America

    • Canada
    • United States
    • Latin America

    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Colombia
    • Chile
    • Mexico
    • Peru
    • Venezuela
  1. International Commercial & Trade
  2. European Union: Council adopts negotiating position on investment control reform

European Union: Council adopts negotiating position on investment control reform

16 Jun 2025    4 minute read
    • Share by email
    • Share on
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Google plus
    • Get link
    • Get QR Code
    • Download
    • Print
FDI Investment Control

In brief

On 12 June 2025, the representatives of the EU Member States in the Committee of Permanent Representatives (Coreper) approved the Council's negotiating mandate to revise Regulation (EU) 2019/452 (EU FDI Screening Regulation) on the screening of foreign direct investment (FDI). This clears the way for the so-called trialogue negotiations with the European Parliament and the European Commission. The aim of the reform is to strengthen the EU's ability to respond to security-related risks of foreign investments and forms part of the EU Commission's agenda of an 'open strategic autonomy' – while at the same time maintaining an open and investment-friendly environment.


Contents

  1. Background and overview of key changes
  2. Position of the Committee on International Trade of the European Parliament
  3. Position of the Council of the European Union
  4. Outlook and next steps
  5. Recommendation

Background and overview of key changes

The current FDI Screening Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/452) has been in force since October 2020. It established a cooperation mechanism between the Member States and the European Commission to assess foreign investments for potential risks to security or public order. It essentially provides for a notice-and-comment procedure, which requires EU Member States to notify the EU Commission when they decide to conduct FDI screenings. The EU Commission and the other EU Member States are then invited to provide their comments on the investment. Due to significant differences in the individual EU Member State FDI screening regimes, the Commission proposed a comprehensive reform in January 2024 as part of its Economic Security Strategy.

The Commission's proposal of January 2024 introduces several important changes, which we have laid out in a previous blogpost. Most notably, all Member States will be required to implement a domestic FDI investment screening regime – which is so far not mandatory. The proposal also introduces a minimum range of industry sectors, such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies and biotechnology, for which FDI filing and clearance requirements shall be provided for under domestic FDI regimes in the EU. It further suggests to clarify that the EU FDI Screening Regulation shall also apply to indirect investments, which are already regularly screened under domestic EU Member State FDI screening regimes.

Position of the Committee on International Trade of the European Parliament

On 8 April 2025, the European Parliament's Committee on International Trade adopted its position on the reform of the FDI Screening Regulation. The Committee largely follows the European Commission's proposal, but goes further in some respects. For example, additional sectors are to be subject to mandatory investment screening in future, including media services, critical raw materials and transport infrastructure. The Committee also advocates greater harmonization of national review procedures in order to facilitate cross-border investments. Importantly, the parliamentary Committee's proposal also advocates for a greater role of the EU Commission in FDI screenings in the EU. A central element of the proposal is the introduction of a standardized EU portal for investment notifications, which should simplify the procedures for companies.

Position of the Council of the European Union

The Council of the EU also supports the Commission's proposal, in particular the mandatory introduction of investment controls in all member states. It clarifies that the EU FDI Screening Regulation shall provide for a minimum harmonization of the sectors and timelines for domestic EU Member State FDI screening procedures and that the EU Member States retain the discretion to subject more industry sectors to their domestic FDI screening regimes. The Council proposes a stronger focus on military and dual-use goods for the minimum range of sectors to be covered by domestic screening regimes. The Committee's proposal also tones down the suggestion for a greater role of the EU Commission. While EU cooperation on FDI screenings is to be made more efficient, the final decision on investments is to remain with the individual member states. It clarifies that the EU FDI Screening Regulation shall not apply to internal reorganizations, which are subject to multiple EU Member State screening regimes.

Outlook and next steps

Now that the Council of the European Union has adopted its position, trilogue negotiations with the European Parliament and the European Commission will begin. In these negotiations, representatives of the three institutions meet to develop a common position on the legislative proposal. The aim is to reach a provisional political agreement that can accelerate the legislative process.

This agreement must then be formally approved by all three institutions – the Parliament, the Council, and the Commission. Only once this formal confirmation has taken place is the law considered adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure and can enter into force.

A political agreement is expected during the course of 2025. Once the new regulation enters into force, a transitional period is likely to follow – with the new rules potentially becoming binding from 2026.

Recommendation

Companies should follow the developments closely and analyze at an early stage what impact the new requirements could have on their investment strategies and compliance processes. We support our clients in M&A deals covering targets in multiple jurisdictions taking the requirements for coordination in the EU under the evolving FDI framework into particular account.

Contact Information
Anahita Thoms LL.M.
Partner
Berlin
Read my Bio
anahita.thoms@bakermckenzie.com
Dr. Alexander Ehrle LL.M. (NYU)
Associate
Berlin
Read my Bio
alexander.ehrle@bakermckenzie.com
Caroline Walka LL.M.
Associate
Berlin
Read my Bio
caroline.walka@bakermckenzie.com
Vanessa Wuestneck LL.M.
Associate
Berlin
Read my Bio
vanessa.wuestneck@bakermckenzie.com
Frederik Doerr
Associate
Berlin
frederik.doerr@bakermckenzie.com

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.

Delete Comment ?

Are you sure want to delete comment ?

Get link
Embed
Share by email
Get QR Code

Scan this QR Code to share this content

  •  
  •  
  •  
HighQ
Copyright Baker McKenzie 2025 | Disclaimers | Supplemental Privacy Statement