International: IBA Site Visit Model Protocol for International Arbitration published

In brief

The International Bar Association's Arbitration Committee Working Group (“Working Group”), with contributions from experts on its drafting such as Baker McKenzie’s new Partner and Head of Dispute Resolution in Johannesburg, Michelle Porter-Wright, has developed a comprehensive Site Visit Model Protocol for International Arbitration.

The Working Group has developed this Site Visit Model Protocol for International Arbitration (“Model Protocol”) to help parties plan and coordinate their site visits. It outlines the Working Group’s view of the best international practices for conducting these visits.


Contents

In more detail

On 10 September 2024, the International Bar Association published its Model Protocol, prepared by the Working Group.

The main aims of the Model Protocol are to:

  • help parties plan and coordinate their site visits
  • share international best practice
  • assist the arbitral community in better understanding and regulating site visits to ensure understanding of the projects and access to evidence
  • be used as a starting point for discussions between the relevant parties once a site visit has been arranged

Importance and purpose of a site visit in international arbitration 

Site visits are an important procedural tool in international arbitration, and can serve two general purposes.

Firstly, a site visit can help an arbitral tribunal better understand the project and can provide important context for the parties’ submissions. In this case, a site visit could include walkthroughs of the site and site procedures, allowing the tribunal to ask questions to achieve a clearer understanding of the party’s operations.

Secondly, a site visit can support evidence gathering and facilitate equal access to evidence. This ensures the arbitral tribunal has a more complete factual record on which to base its award. In this case, the site visit may focus more on inspections, process monitoring, sample collection, or data extraction.

Importance and purpose of the Model Protocol

The Model Protocol has been created to be a starting point for party discussions once a site visit has been agreed or ordered. It considers the two different purposes of a site visit and shares best practices for parties discussing and organizing their site visit. The Working Group advises parties to use the Model Protocol as a basis for site party discussions to lower the risk of any “disputes within disputes” about the specifics of the site visit.

In order to guide and organize the parties’ discussions, the Model Protocol includes a series of standard clauses presented as 13 different articles, addressing key issues that may emerge. Each article is paired with drafting notes, offering the parties additional information and recommendations on procedural matters to consider.

The various topics covered by the articles include:

  • The participants involved in the site visit (Article 2)
  • The purpose, scope, and itinerary of the site visit (Article 5)
  • The preparatory work required before the visit (Article 7)
  • General principles for conducting the visit (Article 9)
  • The rules for collecting and admitting evidence (Article 10)

 The goal of the Model Protocol is to promote a fair, efficient, and productive arbitration process. 

Contact Information
Michelle Porter-Wright
Head of Dispute Resolution
Johannesburg
michelle.porter-wright@bakermckenzie.com

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.