Luxembourg: 2019 Hague Convention incorporated into domestic law in order to facilitate the cross-border enforcement of judgments in Luxembourg

In brief

On 19 December 2025, the Luxembourg law derived from d Draft Bill No. 8550, which amends Article 679 of the New Civil Procedure Code (NCPC) to explicitly reference the Hague Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters ("2019 Hague Convention" or "Convention") will enter into force.

The 2019 Hague Convention provides a uniform and simplified set of core rules for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters across borders, without the need to re-examine the merits of the case in new proceedings, provided that some requirements are met.

This legislative update ensures that the 2019 Hague Convention is clearly visible as a convention facilitating the international circulation of foreign judgments, and consequently strengthens its application by local courts.

For further information or tailored advice, please reach out to your usual Baker McKenzie contact.


Contents

Key takeaways

Scope of the 2019 Hague Convention

The 2019 Hague Convention provides a legal framework for easier enforcement of civil and commercial judgments across jurisdictions. It helps parties overcome procedural difficulties, especially outside the EU, by streamlining the process and reducing time, costs, and uncertainty. The Convention applies to decisions on the merits in civil and commercial cases but excludes specific areas like insolvency, intellectual property, sovereign debt restructuring, and certain antitrust matters.

Requirements for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments

A party requesting recognition and enforcement of a non-EU judgment is required to adhere to the formalities prescribed by Article 12. This includes submitting (i) a complete, certified copy of the judgment and (ii) any documentation necessary to demonstrate that the judgment is effective or enforceable in the State of origin. In cases involving default judgments, it is also mandatory to provide evidence that the initiating document, or its equivalent, was properly served on the defaulting party.

Additionally, the judgment must fulfill at least one of the criteria outlined in Article 5 to qualify for recognition and enforcement. These criteria focus on the connection between the State of origin and the parties involved, as well as the location of contractual performance or wrongful conduct. For example, a judgment may be eligible if the judgment debtor was habitually resident in the State of origin when they became a party to the proceedings.

Finally, even if a judgment meets an Article 5 criterion, the State where recognition and enforcement is sought retains the discretion to refuse in certain limited circumstances. Such grounds include, but are not limited to: (i) the judgment was procured by fraud, (ii) recognition or enforcement would be manifestly contrary to the public policy of the requested State, or (iii) the judgment conflicts with a prior judgment issued by a court of another State involving the same parties and subject matter.

Luxembourg promoting the 2019 Hague Convention in its domestic law

Luxembourg has incorporated the 2019 Hague Convention into its domestic framework to improve recognition and enforcement of non-EU judgments. Bill No. 8550, adopted by the Luxembourg parliament on 20 November 2025, adds the Convention to Article 679 of the New Code of Civil Procedure. Although the Convention already applies in Luxembourg, its inclusion in the NCPC increases its visibility and facilitates recognition and enforcement of non-EU judgments within the country.

Streamlined recognition and enforcement procedure in Luxembourg

Judgments that meet the requirements of the Hague 2019 Convention can take advantage of Luxembourg's expedited recognition and enforcement process, which offers several benefits:

  • Applications can be made ex parte directly to the president of the district court.
  • Enforcement orders can typically be issued within a matter of weeks.
  • Any adversarial proceedings are postponed until the appeal stage.

Additionally, the Hague 2019 Convention restricts judicial discretion by allowing refusal of enforcement only on specific grounds as detailed in Article 5.

Practical example: Post-Brexit enforcement challenges of UK judgments in Luxembourg

After Brexit, UK judgments lost automatic recognition in Luxembourg as they no longer fell under the Brussels I Recast Regulation, and the UK's attempt to join the Lugano Convention failed. Enforcement was limited to cases covered by the Hague Convention 2005, leaving gaps for commercial matters with nonexclusive jurisdiction clauses. This resulted in complex and costly proceedings. However, since 1 July 2025, the 2019 Hague Convention applies to the UK, restoring predictability and efficiency for recognizing and enforcing UK judgments in Luxembourg.

Conclusion

By choosing to explicitly include the Convention in its procedural code, Luxembourg—while not obligated by law—shows a clear dedication to procedural transparency, international collaboration, and greater efficiency. This legislative move boosts Luxembourg's reputation as a reliable venue for cross-border recognition and enforcement, making it even more appealing for resolving international disputes.

Contact Information

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.