International
Asia Pacific
EMEA
North America
Latin America
On 31 July 2024, we wrote an alert on the Federal Court's decision of Obata-Ambak Holdings Sdn Bhd v Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd (Civil Appeal No. 02(i)- 76-08/2022(W)), which was delivered on 26 July 2024 (see Malaysia: Federal Court in Obata-Ambak Holdings Sdn Bhd v Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd).
To recap, the Federal Court in Obata-Ambak unanimously decided that Ang Ming Lee & Ors v Menteri Kesejahteraan Bandar, Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan & Anor and other appeals [2020] 1 MLJ 281 is to be applied prospectively, not retrospectively.
Ang Ming Lee had previously decided that the Minister of Housing and Local Government cannot delegate his powers under the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 to grant an extension of time (EOT) to the Controller to a developer. As a result, the developers could not rely on EOTs obtained from the Controller and were exposed to liquidated ascertained damages.
This alert follows our previous alert on this case and looks to summarise the facts and the Federal Court's findings on the questions of law before it.
Click here to read the full alert.
* * * * *
© 2024 Wong & Partners. All rights reserved. Wong & Partners, member of Baker & McKenzie International. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.
Are you sure want to delete comment ?
Scan this QR Code to share this content
