Mexico: Amendments to the Mexican Amparo Law

In brief

On 13 March 2025, the decree amending several provisions of the Amparo Law ("Reform") was published in the Federal Official Gazette. The Reform seeks to harmonize and systematize such law with the constitutional reform of the Judicial Branch.

The Reform introduces several significant changes that will affect both amparo proceedings and citizens' rights. It aims to improve the efficiency and transparency of the amparo system, strengthen the protection of human rights, and guarantee a more equitable access to justice.


Contents

Key takeaways

The Reform ratifies the amparo relativity principle, meaning that judgments will only benefit the individuals who request the constitutional protection. In line with this, it is reinforced that the amparo will not have general effects, even if the norm was declared unconstitutional for the plaintiff. Likewise, the suspension will not be granted against general norms or laws when requested with general effects, so they are not applied for being considered unconstitutional.

Regarding the general declaration of unconstitutionality, the deadlines and the procedure were modified, since the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) may issue such declaration if, after two consecutive rulings of amparos on review, the general rule is resolved as unconstitutional. The above, provided that the notification process to the issuing authority has been exhausted and said authority has not implemented the pertinent amendments within 90 calendar days.

The Reform also includes measures aimed at strengthening the protection of human rights. Two or more plaintiffs may jointly file an amparo when they suffer a common affectation of their rights or interests, even if such affectation derives from different acts, if such acts cause them similar harm and come from the same authorities. In addition, the victim or injured party of a crime will have the status of complainant, which broadens access to justice for victims of crimes and guarantees greater protection of their rights.

In depth

  • The number of votes required for the SCJN's decisions to be binding for all jurisdictional authorities is reduced from eight to six in cases where the law is established by precedent or by the declaration of unconstitutionality of a general rule.
  • The Chambers of the Congress of the Union and the Federal Executive Branch will keep the power to request the SCJN that an amparo proceeding be processed and resolved as a matter of priority in cases of urgency, taking into account the social interest or public order.
  • The amparo proceedings are modified, since the promotions may be oral in hearings, notifications, and appearances authorized by law. The procedure allows the filing of briefs in printed or electronic form, using the Electronic Signature, in accordance with the regulation issued by the Judicial Administration Body.
  • The Reform implements new provisions to improve the efficiency and transparency of the Amparo system through document digitalization and information technology implementation.
  • The articles referring to the Federal Judiciary Council are adjusted, replacing them with the new judicial bodies, which are the Judicial Discipline Court and the Judicial Administration Body. The amparo trial will not proceed against acts of the Judicial Administration Body and the Judicial Discipline Court.
  • References to the Federal Code of Civil Procedures are replaced by the National Code of Civil and Family Procedures.
  • The provisions mentioning the Federal District are replaced by Mexico City.
  • The term "minimum salary" is replaced by "Unidad de Medida y Actualización" with respect to the fines established in the Amparo Law.

Transition Dispositions

The Reform became effective the day after its publication in the Federal Official Gazette. Until 1 September 2025, when the elected Justices will be sworn in, the SCJN will follow the voting rules of the Amparo Law in effect prior to the publication of the Reform. This implies that the decisions of the SCJN plenary will be binding precedents for all jurisdictional authorities when made by a majority of eight votes.

Likewise, the SCJN plenary will require approval by a majority of at least eight votes to issue a general declaration of unconstitutionality.

These rules will be applicable in the resolution of all matters admitted or pending resolution at the time of the Reform's entry into force, regardless of the stage in which such matters are. They will also apply to matters that are admitted subsequently, before the aforementioned swearing-in.

* * * * *

For more information and to discuss what this development could mean for you, please get in touch with the Baker McKenzie contacts provided above.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.