Mexico: Constitutional amendment introduces popular elections for judicial positions

The legislative branch has approved a groundbreaking constitutional reform in Mexico: the introduction of popular elections for judicial positions

In brief

The House of Representatives, the Senate and the majority of the local legislatures have approved a judicial reform to the Mexican Constitution. This amendment implements the popular election of federal judges, magistrates, and even the Supreme Court justices. Although the reform came into force on 16 September 2024, one day after the publication of the reform decree in the Federal Official Gazette, its implementation will be gradual. Federal judicial elections will occur in two phases: in 2025; the National Electoral Institute will perform elections for Federal Supreme Court justices, magistrates of the new Judicial Discipline Tribunal, the new Administrative Body, and half of the federal district judges and federal circuit magistrates; in 2027, the National Electoral Institute will perform the elections for the remaining positions. This reform affects not only the Federal Judiciary but also the Judiciary of each State. The States will need to modify, within 180 calendar days, their local constitution and laws to ensure their magistrates and judges are also elected by popular vote.


Contents

Key takeaways

The constitutional reform introduces several significant changes that impact all industries:

  1. The popular elections for judicial positions, including judges, magistrates, and Supreme Court justices.
  2. The establishment of an Evaluation Committee within each of the three branches of government, including the executive, legislative and judicial. Each committee will consist of five individuals of recognized prestige. Such Committee will establish evaluation requirements on technical, professional, expertise, performance and social aspects for nominees. If there are too many applicants for a position, a selection process would be carried out to ensure equal representation by reducing the number of applicants.
  3. The reduction of Supreme Court justices from eleven to nine, limiting their tenure to 12 years instead of 15.
  4. The creation of two administrative bodies: one to administer the Judiciary, including the Judicial Training School and the Federal Public Defender's Institute, and a Judicial Disciplinary Tribunal.
  5. The introduction of " faceless judges," allowing them to work anonymously on cases involving organized crime.
  6. The establishment of a maximum term of six months for the issuance of the final decisions of tax matters and one year for criminal matters.
  7. The mandate for the States to adjust their local legislation within 180 calendar days to introduce the popular election of local judges and magistrates.
  8. The modification of the remuneration of the Judicial Branch. It may no longer exceed the compensation of the President of Mexico, eliminating lifetime pensions for current and future Supreme Court ministers.

In depth

The Federal House of Representatives, the Senate, and the majority of the local legislatures have approved the constitutional amendment proposed by the President of Mexico. This amendment aims to reform the judiciary. The reform became effective on 16 September 2024, one day after the publication of the reform decree in the Federal Official Gazette.

One of the main changes of the reform is the introduction of popular elections for judicial positions, including judges, magistrates, and Supreme Court ministers. This would drastically change the current system by allowing citizens to vote for over 1,600 judicial positions across different courts in Mexico. The goal is to democratize the judiciary and increase accountability.

This judicial reform will be implemented gradually. The elections of judicial positions will be carried out in two phases: in 2025, the Supreme Court ministers, magistrates of the new Judicial Discipline Tribunal, the new Administrative Body, and half of the district judges and circuit magistrates; in 2027, the remaining half. Besides, Congress will have 90 calendar days from the decree's coming into effect to amend federal laws. Such amendments and secondary regulations have not yet been considered in Congress or the public debate.

The reform also mandates that States adjust their local legislation to allow for the popular election of local judges and magistrates. States have 180 calendar days to adapt their local constitutions. Besides, all positions in local judicial powers must be renewed by the regular federal election of 2027.

The election process for the Supreme Court justices will proceed as follows:

  • The Senate will issue a call to form a list of candidates.
  • The Federal Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary branches will nominate ten candidates each.
  • The Senate will verify the nominees' eligibility and send the list to the National Electoral Institute by the end of the year.
  • The National Electoral Institute will conduct the election counts and communicate the results to the Senate.
  • The Senate will publish the results and send them to the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary.
  • The Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary will address any challenges, qualify the process, and announce the results before the Senate begins its first ordinary session period of the election year.

In relation to the 2024-2025 electoral process, the Senate will have 30 calendar days from the reform's effective date to issue the call for the compilation of candidate lists for the special election, excluding nominations of the Supreme Court's plenary. The preparation for the 2025 special election will commence with the first session conducted by the General Council of the National Electoral Institute within seven days of the reform taking effect. The election day is scheduled for the first Sunday of June 2025.

This reform represents a major milestone in the Mexican judicial system. While controversial, it will bring about challenges in terms of implementation and potential politicization of the judicial process. Businesses and legal professionals need to pay close attention to these changes and be prepared to adapt to a potentially more dynamic judicial environment. It is also essential to pay attention to the revision of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement in 2026, the reaction of the Supreme Court justices to this constitutional amendment, and any legal challenges that may be brought against it.

*Yuriria Mascott, Legal Consultant at Baker McKenzie, also contributed to this alert.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.