Philippines: Revised guidelines on court-annexed mediation and judicial dispute resolution in civil cases take effect on 1 March 2021

In brief

Recent developments

The Supreme Court has issued Administrative Matter No. 19-10-20-SC or the 2020 Guidelines for the Conduct of Court-Annexed Mediation (CAM) and Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) in Civil Cases (“Revised Guidelines”), which took effect on 1 March 2021. 


The Revised Guidelines were issued in light of the amendments introduced by the 2019 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure, which took effect on 1 May 2020, and is an update to the Consolidated CAM and JDR Guidelines issued in 2011. As noted in our article on the 2019 Amendments, Pre-trial/CAM/JDR were amended as follows:

  • Marking of evidence, stipulations and comparisons with originals, are to be done during the pre-trial hearing. The pre-trial order will contain tentative schedules for CAM and JDR. 
  • Once the court refers the parties to CAM, it should be finished within a non-extendible period of 30 calendar days. If CAM fails, the court will determine if JDR is still necessary. 
  • If JDR is deemed necessary, the case will be raffled to another court who will conduct the JDR. JDR is to be conducted within a non-extendible 15 calendar days. If JDR fails, the case will be returned to the court where the case originated, for trial as scheduled in the pre-trial order. This is a shift from the previous practice of JDR being conducted by the court where the case was filed, and passed on to another court if the JDR fails.

Highlights of the Revised Guidelines

Below are some highlights worth noting in the Revised Guidelines:

  • The Revised Guidelines only cover CAM and JDR in civil cases.  As of present, there is no JDR for criminal cases, while CAM for criminal cases is generally provided for under the Revised Guidelines on Continuous Trial for Criminal Cases.
  • Cases that must be referred to CAM are the following:
  1. all ordinary civil cases, civil cases covered by the Rule on Summary Procedure (i.e., ejectment), and family law cases, except those which cannot be compromised (i.e., those which involve civil status, validity of marriage, legal separation, future support and legitime);
  2. all special civil actions, except declaratory relief, review of Comelec and COA resolutions and final orders, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, quo warranto, expropriation and contempt;
  3. claims against the estate, or distribution or partition of estate in intestate proceedings; 
  4. intellectual property cases;
  5. commercial or intra-corporate controversies; and
  6. environmental cases
  • Cases that may be referred to JDR are the following:
  1. cases in 1 to 5 above, if CAM fails and the court is convinced that settlement is still possible; and
  2. some cases appealed to the regional trial courts (i.e., forcible entry and unlawful detainer, civil cases involving title to, or possession of, real property, settlement of estate). Note: Previously, these cases undergo mandatory JDR.
  • Cases that may not be referred to CAM and JDR (unless the parties agree) are the following:
  1. those which cannot be compromised (i.e., those which involve civil status, validity of marriage, legal separation, future support and legitime);
  2. petitions for habeas corpus;
  3. probate of a will; and
  4. cases with pending applications for TRO or preliminary injunction.
  • The court may refer the parties to CAM and JDR at any stage of the proceedings, when either or both of the parties request, there is a significant likelihood of settlement, and there are still factual issues to be resolved.
  • A JDR judge can make a non-binding impartial evaluation of the chances of the parties’ success.
  • Individual parties can only appear through a representative for a valid cause, such as acts of God, force majeure or duly substantiated physical inability.
  • Representatives of individual or corporate entities should have a special power of attorney, which among others, authorizes the representative to appear and negotiate without need of further approval by or notification to the principal.
  • A party that fails to attend CAM or JDR or bring the required authorization without valid cause, or having full authority, refuses to exercise the same or claims that require further approval from the principal, may merit sanctions such as dismissal of plaintiff's case, ex parte presentation of plaintiff's evidence, contempt, or reimbursement of costs.
  • CAM should not exceed 30 calendar days.  JDR should not exceed 15 calendar days.  Both are non-extendible.

Actions to consider

Given the above developments, clients who plan to initiate a suit should consider whether their cases will be the subject of mandatory CAM, as well as the timeline when CAM will happen (i.e., only after pre-trial). The non-extendible 30 calendar days for CAM is a welcome development, as it mitigates the usual delays brought about by this process.

Meanwhile, clients with pending cases may want to consider exploring the possibility of requesting that their cases be referred to CAM and JDR, if settlement is an option.

Clients should also keep in mind that representatives attending CAM or JDR should have the authority to settle without need of further approval by or notification to the principal.

* * * * *

LOGO Philippines_QuisumbingTorres_Manila

*Authored by Quisumbing Torres, a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein. Please contact for inquiries.

Contact Information
Eliseo Zuniga, Jr.
Quisumbing Torres, Manila
Dranyl Jared Amoroso
Senior Associate
Quisumbing Torres, Manila

© 2021 Baker & McKenzie. Ownership: This site (Site) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms, including Baker & McKenzie LLP). Use of this site does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All information on this Site is of general comment and for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulation and practice are subject to change. The information on this Site is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter, whether it be legal, procedural or otherwise. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any information provided in this Site. Baker McKenzie, the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the contents and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Site. Attorney Advertising: This Site may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Site may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. All rights reserved. The content of the this Site is protected under international copyright conventions. Reproduction of the content of this Site without express written authorization is strictly prohibited.