International
Asia Pacific
EMEA
North America
Latin America
After more than half a century, Thailand is now proceeding to de-legislate criminal offenses related to the issuance of checks. The first Thai legislation prescribing criminal offenses arising from check issuance came into effect on 13 October 1954, making Thailand one of the few countries that impose criminal liability on the dishonest use of checks. While the 1954 law significantly deterred the public from using bad checks to commit fraud and other illegal activities, it was largely used by creditors to create bargaining power or to pressure or threaten debtors, who sometimes issued checks honestly. Consequently, there have been criticisms that the law actually deters people from using checks altogether. A notable problem arising from imposing criminal liabilities on check issuers is when a debtor is demanded to issue a pre-dated check to a creditor. If such a check bounces, the creditor can take criminal action against the debtor. It has therefore been a common practice for creditors in many industries across Thailand to demand debtors to issue checks as guarantees for creditors.
Since then, several amendments have been made to balance creditors' commercial rights and debtors' human rights.
Currently, the Offenses Related to the Issuance of Cheques Act, B.E. 2534 (1991) ("Cheques Act"), which is in effect, still imposes criminal liability on check issuers. Although the Cheques Act attempts to address the preceding critiques by only penalizing bad checks that are issued for payment of genuine and legally enforceable debt, the practice of penalizing individuals for bad checks still remains. The potential penalty includes imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine not exceeding THB 60,000 or both. The elements of the offense require the issuance of a check to pay for a real and legally enforceable debt (i) with an intent not to honor such check; (ii) with no funds in the account to honor the check at the time of issuance; (iii) for an amount higher than the available funds in the account at the time of issuance; (iv) with the withdrawal of the entire or partial amount in the account to the extent that the remainder is insufficient to cover the check; or (v) with dishonestly directing the bank not to honor such check.
On 27 November 2023, the Thai Cabinet passed a resolution approving the draft act to de-legislate the Cheques Act ("De-Legislate Act"). The legal consequence of this De-Legislate Act is to repeal the Cheques Act entirely. One of the main reasons is to comply with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which sets out that no one should be imprisoned merely for failing to fulfill contractual obligations. As of today, the De-Legislate Act is under the consideration of the Senate Ad-hoc Committee. The major consequences upon its effective date will be as follows:
We will closely monitor the progress of this legislation and notify you of any developments.
Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.
Are you sure want to delete comment ?
Scan this QR Code to share this content
