Ukraine: Judicial reform - new role of the Supreme Court case law

In brief

On 8 February 2020, the changes to the procedural codes became effective, significantly increasing the role of the Supreme Court case law in the reconsideration of court decisions in Ukraine.


What’s new?

Previously, the decision on merits could be challenged with the Supreme Court in the event of breach of substantive or procedural law.

Now, in addition to that, when filing the cassation complaint the claimant shall also prove one of the following:

  • The lower court when rendering a challenged decision failed to take into account the relevant position of the Supreme Court on the application of substantive law.
  • Although the lower court took into account the relevant position of the Supreme Court as explained above, there is a need to depart from such position of the Supreme Court.
  • There is no relevant position of the Supreme Court on the application of substantive law.
  • Failure to prove the above shall prevent the cassation proceedings.


The new regulations set a higher threshold for challenging the decisions with the Supreme Court, which in many cases shall reduce the review of the court decisions to the appellate stage only. This may also have positive impact on the time and quality of consideration of pending cassation complaints.

Overall, the existence of the relevant opinion of the Supreme Court shall make the consideration of the case by the lower courts more predictable.

This article is also available on Insight.

Contact Information

© 2021 Baker & McKenzie. Ownership: This site (Site) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms, including Baker & McKenzie LLP). Use of this site does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All information on this Site is of general comment and for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulation and practice are subject to change. The information on this Site is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter, whether it be legal, procedural or otherwise. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any information provided in this Site. Baker McKenzie, the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the contents and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Site. Attorney Advertising: This Site may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Site may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. All rights reserved. The content of the this Site is protected under international copyright conventions. Reproduction of the content of this Site without express written authorization is strictly prohibited.