In focus
Resolution 2764 became effective in September 2022 and established that, as of the time an employment credit was enforceable, it should be updated with the banks’ loan interest rates. The resulting interest had to be capitalized when the complaint was served and be successively capitalized once a year until the date of the final calculation of the amounts awarded at judgment.
Such formula was applicable to lawsuits that had not yet reached final judgment by Resolution 2764’s effective date. For further information on Resolution 2764, we recommend reading our labor alert where we analyzed its parameters.
The SCJ stated in its ruling on the Oliva case that the formula of Resolution 2764 led to a noticeably disproportionate result, since it had raised the case’s award by 7734%, and that the periodic and successive capitalization is contrary to the provisions of the CCC, which does not allow the application of interest over interest.
The SCJ also highlighted in its ruling that Section 770 of the CCC only allows a single capitalization in the event that someone seeks in court payment of obligation to give money, in which case the accrual operates from the date of the complaint’s service of notice. However, it does not allow successive, periodic capitalizations during the judicial process.
Based on this ruling, the SCJ instructed the NEAC that previously intervened in the case to issue a new ruling in line with these new parameters.
Although the CSJN Ruling applies to this particular case, it represents relevant case law that would modify the terms of Resolution 2764 and would limit future rulings of the NEAC and lower courts, which would have to adjust to these new criteria of the Oliva precedent.
Click here to access the Spanish version.
