Germany: German Legislator passes amendments to German Infection Protection Act (IfSG) - 3G and the obligation to work from the Home Office

In brief

We are currently in the 4th wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The German legislator is now reacting to this with nationwide new measures for business establishments. Until now, different regulations have applied in each federal state, which is now to change for reasons of legal clarity: On Wednesday, 17 November 2021, the German government passed the "Act to amend the Infection Protection Act and other laws on the repeal of the determination of the epidemic situation of national scope" (IfSG-ÄnderungsG). The reason for the amendments to the law is also the expiry of the regulation on epidemic situation on 24 November. The legislation was approved by the Bundesrat on 18 November 2021. Major changes include the (reintroduction of the) home office obligation and the nationwide introduction of the 3G regulation (vaccinated/recovered/tested negative), which has so far only applied in some federal states with regard to workplaces. The amendments are expected to come into force in calendar week 47 and will apply until 19 March 2022. As a result, previously applicable state regulations will be largely superseded.


The new regulations in overview

Mainly, Sec. 28b of the German Infection Protection Act (IfSG) will be supplemented by new or old regulations, which are expected to apply nationwide from calendar week 47:

Sec. 28b IfSG (new version) shall include:

  • Reintroduction of the obligation to work from the Home Office, already in force until 30 June 2021, regarding office or comparable employees, and
  • Introduction of the 3G rule at the workplace to access the business site.

Obligation to work from the Home Office

As expected from calendar week 47, the general obligation to work from the Home Office for employees in office work will apply again. For this purpose, the previous wording from Sec. 28b (7) IfSG (old version), as already contained in the IfSG (old version) until June 30, has been reintroduced in Sec. 28b (4) IfSG (new version).

In specific terms, this means that employers are in principle again obliged to offer work from home and that the employees must in principle accept this offer.

In the course of the reintroduction, we assume that the same requirements that already applied from April 30 to June 30 this year will also apply again in the future.

Exceptions are provided for if "compelling operational reasons" on the employer's side prevent a remote activity with regard to an individual employee. This is likely to be the case only in exceptional cases of significant operational disruptions.

In principle, the employee is obliged to accept the offer unless there is a reason not to do so. This provides a wide scope for arguing that, in individual cases, work should be nevertheless carried out from the office, e.g. because there is insufficient space in the employee's home or the employee does not have his or her own workplace. The parties involved thus retain a certain degree of flexibility here. The legislator has not made use of the possibility of a "stricter" obligation to work from home.

3G rule at the workplace

Until now, employers in Germany were only required to provide at least two free tests under the SARS-COVID- 19 Occupational Health and Safety Regulation. However, employees were free to decide whether to make use of this offer. Initial federal state regulations (e.g. in Bavaria and Hesse) had already introduced the 3G rule in the workplace in last weeks. These state regulations are now expected to be superseded by a uniform federal regulation in Sec. 28b IfSG (new version) as of calendar week 47. When coming into force, the 3G rule is to apply until 19 March 2022, regardless of whether an epidemic situation has been identified. This is also a new development.

First of all, it is important that the new federal regulation shall apply regardless of incidence or hospitalization values, etc. Until now, the federal state regulations were linked to when certain measured thresholds were surpassed.

Employees who cannot provide respective 3G evidence as defined in Sec. 2 of the COVID-19 Protective Measures Exemption Regulation (SchAusnahmV) may not enter the workplace if contact between the employer and employees or with third parties cannot be excluded. This also applies to the transport of employees to and from the workplace. The 3G obligation has thus been extended locally and no longer applies only in enclosed office spaces. There is also no limitation to a minimum number of employees. This should mean that the great majority of companies in Germany will be obliged to comply with the 3G rule.

In principle, a rapid test is also sufficient as proof of testing. In the sense of Sec. 2 No. 7 SchAusnahmV, sufficient test evidence is, in addition to PCR tests, any rapid test that is no older than 24 hours and:

  • is performed on site under the supervision of the employer; or
  • has been performed by qualified personnel (e.g., company doctor); or
  • has been performed and supervised by an external body according to Sec. 6 of the Coronavirus Test Regulation (e.g. medical doctors, test centers).

A PCR test result is valid for 48 hours according to Sec. 28b (4) (new version).

In order to carry out a test as defined by the SARS-COVID-19 Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, it is now expressly stipulated that employees are also allowed access without prior proof. However, there is no obligation of employers to offer a test that meets the above requirements in accordance with Sec. 2 No. 7 SchAusnahmV. The decision as to whether or not to take on this additional organizational effort is left to the companies.

The employer must check compliance with the 3G rule before accessing the workplace. This can be done by internal or external personnel (e.g. a security company).

The new measures could be referred to as an "indirect right to question", since in practice, most employees will probably provide information about their vaccination status. However, it remains the case that employees – with the exception in sensitive areas – are not obliged to disclose their vaccination status to the employer, as there is still no legal basis for this. This means that the employee is free to choose as to which of the three "G's" he/she will provide proof of. In fact, however, vaccinated employees likely will report their vaccination status to the employer as part of the checks.

A new regulation is that proof must either be carried or kept available for inspection or can be deposited with the employer. This applies to all types of proof: vaccination, recovery and tests. This means that in the future, employees will be able to exempt themselves from the daily presentation of proof by showing and "depositing" their proof of vaccination with their employer once.

There are good arguments that the time for taking a test is not considered working time, since the test is not solely in the interest of the employer, but significantly in the interest of the employee, who chooses to present a test result instead of proof of vaccination or recovery in order to access the workplace.

In Sec. 28b IfSG (new version), explicit reference is now also made to data protection law.

Employers will be allowed to collect and store the data as part of access controls and to use it in relation to the company hygiene concept. The special protection requirements of Sec. 22 (2) of the German Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG) for special categories of personal data apply.

The planned changes do not cover how to deal with employees who refuse to comply with the testing obligation despite not having been vaccinated or recovered. Provided that working from home is possible from a company organizational point of view, the employer will generally be obliged to accept the work performance from home. If working from home is not possible and the employee refuses to comply with the 3G rule, the obligation to pay remuneration generally does not apply. Compensation for loss of earnings under the recently amended Section 56 IfSG is also likely to be excluded, since the 3G rule creates a specific preventive measure and compliance with it could have prevented loss of earnings.

Outlook

It is good that employers are finally given the opportunity to adequately protect their employees based on better information and to obtain an overview of the vaccination rate in the company. The planned simplified monitoring options, especially with regard to vaccinated employees, are also a positive change.

It is to be welcomed that employees must now also present a rapid test result every day and no longer only on 2 days a week and that employers may store the (voluntarily) communicated vaccination status and use it for the company hygiene concept. The changes relieve companies which are not expected to allow non-vaccinated individuals to carry out the tests on the company premises.

The SARS-COVID-19 Occupational Health and Safety Regulation remains in force and is also to be extended until 19 March 2022. The obligation for employers to offer COVID-tests to employees free of charge at least twice a week will continue to exist.

Click here to access the German version.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.