Germany: No digital access rights for trade unions

In brief

The Federal Labor Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht, BAG) ruled on 28 January 2025 (docket number 1 AZR 33/24) that employers are not obliged to grant trade unions access to employees via the company's internal digital communication channels. Employers do not have to provide the company email addresses to the trade unions or link the trade union on the company intranet. The BAG thus agrees with the lower courts, which have also rejected the so-called "digital right of access" - a digital right of access does not follow either from the freedom of association enshrined in Article 9 (3) of the German Constitution (Grundgesetz, GG) or for other legal reasons.


Facts of the case

The trade union responsible for the employer requested the disclosure of employees' business email addresses or at least guest access via their own email address. In addition, the trade union demanded that the company provides a link to its website on the homepage of the intranet. According to the trade union, such a right follows from its constitutionally protected freedom of activity under Art. 9 para. 3 GG.

Background

The relationship between the trade union and the employer is determined both by the German Works Constitution Act (Betriebsverfasunsgesetz, BetrVG) and by the case law of the BAG on Article 9 para. 3 of the GG.

In principle, the employer must work together with the trade unions represented in the company in a spirit of trust for the benefit of the employees and the company. In this context, the trade unions and their representatives must also be granted access to the company. However, this right of access is not unlimited. It is limited by the cases in which the tasks and powers specified in the BetrVG are exercised, as well as the employer's security and confidentiality interests. According to the wording of the law, there is actually no right of access for advertising purposes of the trade union, as advertising is a collective bargaining policy purpose and not a works constitution law purpose. However, in the past, the BAG derived a right of access from Art. 9 para. 3 GG also for the advertising of members. According to the BAG, a trade union cannot effectively perform its duties if it has no possibility of recruiting members. This includes not only (analogous) access to the company. This also includes the employer's obligation to tolerate the trade union sending advertising to business email addresses already known to it.

The unique characteristic of the case now decided by the BAG is that the trade union demanded that the company not only tolerates but also actively grants access to all business email addresses in order to no longer be limited to the business email addresses already known to it when advertising.

Key statements on the trade union's digital access rights

The BAG has clarified that:

  • There is no right to the surrender of employees' business email addresses.
  • There is no right to use the employer's digital communication channels.
  • There is no entitlement to a link on the intranet on the part of the trade union.

In its ruling, the BAG states that Art. 9 para. 3 GG grants a trade union the fundamental right to use employees' company email addresses for advertising purposes and for their information. However, the BAG rejects an obligation to actively provide the business email address. Such an obligation would lead to an unreasonable disadvantage to the employer's interest in economic activity. When the courts determine the freedom of association, not only the interests of the trade unions must be taken into account, but also the fundamental rights of the employers. The interests of the trade unions are already satisfied by the fact that they are entitled to ask employees for their business email address on site at the company and to contact them via this address.

The BAG also clarified that there is no entitlement to a link to the trade union website on the company intranet. There is no statutory regulation in this respect in the BetrVG and is not intended by the legislator.

Practical advice

In practice, this is a very positive decision and important for the increasingly digitalized world of work. Overall, it is a step in the right direction. It remains to be hoped that case law will also create legal clarity in other areas of the digitalization of the world of work with decisions that are also convincing in practice. 

For the time being, it remains to be said on the employer side:

Tolerance of advertising emails from the union to business email addresses already known to the union: Yes
Active distribution of company email addresses of employees: No
Allowing the use of digital communication channels 
beyond already known email addresses:
No
Link to the trade union on the intranet: No

 

*****

Click here to read the German version.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.