International: HR Trend Watch - Navigating new developments in flexible work

In brief

It has become clear that flexibility is currency in the new working world and legal frameworks are evolving to catch up with the changing working culture. Four-day work-weeks, flexible working arrangements and the right to disconnect are all on offer to employees, giving the opportunity for better work-life balance, and giving employers a competitive edge in talent retention.

While these concepts cannot be blindly adopted across borders or industries, given the vast differences that exist in attitudes to working hours, demands of specific industries and the global nature of teams, we are seeing increasing numbers of multi-national organizations implementing flexible working programs. Meanwhile, lawmakers across the globe are continuing to introduce new flexible working measures, offering greater protections to workers and resulting in a patchwork of nuanced guidance and regulation. Here’s our take on how this is playing out across the globe:


Contents

Right to disconnect

France was the pioneer in this area introducing a "right to disconnect" law in 2016, followed by BelgiumItalySpain, Portugal and Luxembourg in EMEA. More jurisdictions followed suit in the thick of the pandemic as the trend became more of a necessity. Since 2021, there has been a pending resolution in the European Union calling for an EU directive on the right to disconnect. In the LATAM region, the right to disconnect became a reality including in Argentina, Colombia, Chile and Peru. In the North America region, Canada has likewise mandated employers with more than 25 employees to create a "Disconnecting from Work Policy." More recently, in the APAC region, Taiwan and Thailand issued new guidelines, supporting employees’ right to disconnect with corresponding sanctions for violation.

 

Four-day work week

Last year, we heard a lot about the four-day working week, primarily in Europe – see our alerts for Belgium and Austria. Since then, following its move to a 4.5-day working week in 2022, the UAE has now implemented a four-day work-week for federal government employees effective from 1 July 2023. In the LATAM region, Chile recently reduced the mandatory working hours from 45 to 40 hours per week while allowing companies to distribute these hours across a minimum of four days (previously five days).

 

Flexible work arrangements 

The right to request flexible work arrangements has likewise gained traction in the past year, which resulted in the creation of laws on remote work or teleworking. In APAC, Australia recently allowed certain categories of employees the right to request for flexible work arrangements. In the Philippines, the government encourages employers to adopt flexible work arrangements for pregnant employees and those exposed to extreme heat and strenuous activities. Meanwhile, the UK's employment bill, which includes the right to request flexible work, has received Royal Assent.

 

A full copy of the alert can be viewed here

 

 

Contact Information

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.