Italy: Employment Law Newsletter | February 2025

In brief

This publication features the latest employment developments in Italy, including new laws on fringe benefits, and case law on controls on employees' devices, remote work for disabled employees, and the burden of proof in disciplinary charges.


New laws and regulations

Employers can give debit cards to their employees to allow them to enjoy fringe benefits

According to Italian laws, an employer can provide employees with  goods and services instead of paying them monetary sums. These fringe benefits, within certain limits, are exempt from taxation. Recently, a company formally inquired with the Italian Revenue Agency, to ask whether employees can be provided with specific debit cards that may be used only by the beneficiaries to receive goods and services from selected vendors. The Italian Revenue Agency confirmed the feasibility of this solution and the exemption from taxation of the relevant sums, within the limits set by Italian tax laws. According to the Agency, the sums credited on the cards may only be used for company welfare purposes, therefore complying with Italian tax legislation. 

Case law developments

Controls on employees' devices

In a recent ruling, the Italian Supreme Court ruled that an employer may only carry out forensic controls on its employees' devices if said controls (i) are carried out only after the employer starts suspecting that an employee committed unlawful activity and (ii) concern only data that refers to a period subsequent to the occurrence of such suspicion. 
In the case at stake, the Supreme Court ruled that the dismissal of an employee was unlawful as it was based on forensic controls, carried out on data stored on the controlled devices, took place before the employer started suspecting misconduct.

Remote work for disabled employees

According to the Italian Supreme Court, remote working must be considered a reasonable accommodation to be implemented by employers to guarantee their disabled employees' right to work, where such accommodation does not result in an unreasonable financial burden. In this specific case, the court ruled that the refusal of an employer to allow a disabled employee to work remotely was unlawful, considering that (i) the physical conditions of the employee made accessing the company's premises difficult and (ii) remote working was regulated by a shop-level collective bargaining agreement.

Burden of proof in case of multiple disciplinary charges

If an employee is dismissed for cause following a disciplinary proceeding, in which the employee was charged with multiple disciplinary breaches, each of them independently can be used to justify the dismissal. Therefore, when challenging the dismissal, it is up to the employee to prove that all the disciplinary complaints, together, are insufficient to justify a dismissal for cause.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.