Italy: Employment Law Newsletter | March 2025

New laws and regulations

New procedure for voluntary resignations: the guidelines from the National Labour Inspectorate

In December 2024, the Italian Government passed new rules for voluntary resignations following unjustified absences. In particular, if an employee is absent without justification for a period longer than the term provided by the collective bargaining agreements or, in the absence of a contractual provision, for more than 15 days, the employment relationship will be automatically terminated at the employee's will. In this case, an employer is required to notify the competent Labor Inspectorate to allow it to carry out the relevant checks. The National Labour Inspectorate has given some guidelines to follow in these cases:

  • The employer is required to notify the competent territorial Inspectorate via certified email, filling out a specific form provided by the Inspectorate.
  • The Inspectorate has 30 days to carry out its checks, also by means of interviews with the concerned employee.
  • Employees are required to prove the reasons justifying their absence and the reasons why they could not notify the employer of said absences.
  • If, following the checks, the Inspectorate deems that the absence was justified, the employment relationship must be restored. Otherwise, the employment relationship is deemed terminated.
  • If the Inspectorate finds that the employer engaged in serious misconduct, the resignations may be qualified as having been tendered for just cause (without notice).

Case law developments

Redeployment after dismissal

Under Italian laws, before making a non-executive employee redundant, the employer is required to check if the employee may be redeployed to another position within the company, also by means of demotion. However, the Italian Supreme Court recently clarified that this redeployment obligation does not require the employer to create new ad hoc roles or assign the redundant employees to duties that are not compatible with their professional background.

Straining the workforce

Italian labor laws require employers to protect their employees' health and safety, not only from a physical point of view, but also with regard to their mental health. The Italian Supreme Court ruled that this obligation to protect health and safety is not only breached in the case of bullying, but also in the case of straining the workforce. In fact, an employer may be held liable if it allows, even negligently, the existence of a stressful environment that causes damage to employees' health, or engages in conduct that may induce discomfort or stress.

Unlawful use of caregivers' leaves of absence

The Italian Supreme Court confirmed that employees who misuse their caregivers' leaves of absence can be dismissed for just cause. In fact, in a recent decision, the Court ruled that an employee caught playing sports while on leave can be lawfully dismissed, as the leave is given specifically to assist disabled relatives and not for other purposes.

Scope of whistleblowing protection

The Italian Supreme Court confirmed a well-established principle, according to which whistleblowing reports cannot be issued for personal reasons or for claims and disputes inherent to the employment relationship. Italian legislation, implementing the EU Whistleblowing Directive, has also introduced this principle.

Dismissal of disabled employees on sick leave

According to Italian employment laws, employees on sick leave cannot be made redundant during a protected period, the length of which varies based on the collective bargaining agreement applied to the employee's employment relationship. Once the protected period is over, an employer is free to dismiss a sick employee, by giving the employee notice as contractually due.

According to the Italian Supreme Court, however, the same protected period cannot be applied equally to disabled and non-disabled employees, as this would constitute indirect discrimination. The Court deems that the employer must check if the employee's sick leave is related to their disability and, in this case, identify possible reasonable accommodations before proceeding with dismissal.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.