Malaysia: Key amendments to the Industrial Relations Regulations 2009

In brief

The amendments to the Industrial Relations Regulations 2009, have come into force on 15 May 2025.

These changes address several key areas, including the requirements for the recognition of a trade union, conduct of secret ballots, and the timeline for the deemed withdrawal of a representation for unfair dismissal.


Contents

Recognition of trade unions

Following the amendments, if an employer/trade union of employers is satisfied that the scope of membership of a trade union of workmen making the claim for recognition to represent relevant workmen/class of workmen is in accordance with the constitution of the relevant trade union, the employer/trade union of employers shall voluntarily accord recognition to such trade union via a prescribed form.

A copy of the prescribed form must then be sent to the Director General of Industrial Relations (DGIR) within 14 days of its issuance.

With these amendments, employers/trade union of employers are compelled to accord recognition to the trade union if its scope of membership is in accordance with its constitution.

Secret ballot to determine sole bargaining rights

For context, secret ballots are used to either ascertain the percentage of workmen who support the trade union seeking recognition, or to identify the preferred trade union to be granted sole bargaining rights. Recent amendments to the Industrial Relations Act 1967 have clarified the concept of sole bargaining rights, where the new provisions allow multiple trade unions recognized by the same employer to decide among themselves who should be granted sole bargaining rights. If an agreement cannot be reached, the employer/trade union of employers/trade union of workmen concerned can apply to the DGIR in writing for a decision. The DGIR may then take steps to resolve the application, or conduct enquiries through a secret ballot.

The amendments to the Regulations provide that where any trade union of workmen competing for sole bargaining rights:

  1. Fails to attend the secret ballot meeting after two attempts, or
  2. Declares its intention not to participate in the determination of sole bargaining rights,

the trade union of workmen shall be presumed uninterested and excluded from the determination of sole bargaining rights.

The DGIR will then decide which trade union of workmen will be granted sole bargaining rights.

On the other hand, where a secret ballot is conducted to decide on the sole bargaining right of a trade union of workmen, the new regulations outline the following provisions:

  1. The trade union of workmen securing the highest number of votes in the secret ballot shall be granted sole bargaining rights.
  2. In the event of a tie, the DGIR shall carry out a further secret ballot among the trade unions of workmen receiving equivalent highest number of votes, until one union obtains the highest number of votes.
  3. In carrying out any subsequent secret ballot stipulated under item (b) above:
    1. The DGIR shall decide the date, time, venue and any other matter which are necessary for conducting the secret ballot, in a new prescribed form.
    2. The employer/trade union of employers shall affix copies of the prescribed notice for the secret ballot, at a conspicuous place in the premises of the employers concerned as determined by the DGIR, for seven consecutive days immediately preceding the day of the casting of the secret ballot.
    3. Workmen entitled to vote must be listed in the prescribed form.

In essence, the amendments clarify the procedures for the conduct of secret ballots (particularly in the instance of a tie or where one party fails to attend), and introduces new and revised forms to be used during the process.

Timeline for deemed withdrawal of a representation for unfair dismissal

When a workman files a representation for unfair dismissal, the initial step requires both the workman and former employer to attend a conciliation process at the Industrial Relations Department (IRD). If this process is unsuccessful, the matter will be automatically referred to the Industrial Court for adjudication (which entails a full trial).

If the workman fails to attend any of the conciliation meetings at the IRD after two attempts, the DGIR will send a notice via a prescribed form to the workman's last known address, instructing him/her to attend the final conference (i.e., conciliation meeting).

The amendments to the Regulations provide that if the workman fails to attend this final conciliation meeting on the specified date without giving any reasonable excuse for such absence within 60 days (instead of the previously provided 30 days), the DGIR may deem the representation as withdrawn. 

* * * * *

Yen Ni Wong, Legal Assistant, contributed to this update.

LOGO Malaysia_Wong & Partners_KualaLumpur

© 2025 Wong & Partners. All rights reserved. Wong & Partners, member of Baker & McKenzie International. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.