South Africa: Bridging the pay gap through transparency

In brief

According to reports, South Africa has the widest income gap in the world. This income equality demands a commitment to transparency, collaboration and empowerment. In addition to the country's current laws and legal developments that address this gap, further laws and regulations around pay transparency are predicted to be announced in the coming years. However, people-centric businesses are not waiting to be guided by law and are already implementing processes that ensure equal pay and access to opportunity for everyone in the workforce.


In more detail

Wage gaps based on gender, race and ethnicity are on the radar of governments around the world. Addressing this disparity has become crucial to alleviating the growing socio-economic imbalances brought about by income inequality. This is especially true for South Africa, which has, according to reports, the widest income gap in the world.

Recently introduced regulations in major regions have focused on issues such as public reporting on pay gaps and transparency requirements and often include significant financial penalties for non-compliance. In the European Union, organisations will soon face significant obligations under the Pay Transparency Directive (effective from 2026), while in the United States, several states have already introduced pay transparency requirements.

South Africa is considered to be one of the world's most unequal countries when it comes to income. Research by Aroop Chatterjee, Léo Czajka and Amory Gethin found that, before taxes, the share of average income going to the top 1% of earners in South Africa increased by 50% in the period 1993–2019, while the income of the poorest 50% decreased by more than 30% after inflation. South Africa’s Gini coefficient is a good starting point from which to locate the discussion. According to Statista, South Africa's Gini coefficient was forecast to be 0.63 in 2023, the highest in the world. The coefficient measures equality on a scale between 0 and 1. A score of 0 is perfect equality and 1 is complete inequality.

Unemployment in South Africa is one of the key reasons for this inequality. In the second quarter of 2023, the unemployment rate in the country was 32.6%. Gender is also a factor. According to the latest World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Report, South African women receive between 23% and 35% less than men for the same work. Stats SA has similar figures, noting recently that the gender wage gap alone was about 30% across the board.

South Africa’s employment equity legislation obligates designated employers (employers who employ more than 50 employees or meet a certain annual turnover threshold) to report income differentials across both race and gender groups. However, this is a confidential document submitted to the Department of Employment & Labour and does not have to be made public. In addition to complying with these legal requirements, forward-thinking employers address income inequality within their businesses by analysing data on pay differentials and conducting audits of their employment policies and practices.


Recent changes to South Africa's Companies Amendment Bill (Amendment Bill), currently before the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Trade, Industry and Competition, highlight one of the government's attempts to address the country's income inequality challenges. The amendments require that certain categories of businesses disclose information on the remuneration of their directors and prescribed officers. Companies must also disclose their employees' average remuneration as well as the incomes of the top 5% of the highest and lowest paid employees in the company. Shareholders must also approve the company's remuneration policy. As part of the portfolio committee’s deliberations, it was recently decided that JSE-listed companies would not need to disclose gender pay gap ratios. This stipulation was submitted as part of the process of public comments on the Amendment Bill and although the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Ebrahim Patel, agreed to the addition of such a clause, it meant that the Amendment Bill would have to be resubmitted for public comment, lengthening the time it would take for the amendment bill to be implemented as law.

In the meantime, many businesses are taking a proactive approach to eliminating pay discrimination at work by engaging with their employees before implementing processes such as pay disclosure, pay audits and giving employees the right to access pay data. A new ILO study, Pay transparency legislation: Implications for employers’ and workers’ organizations, studied the gender pay gap and found that "Pay transparency may provide workers with the information and evidence they require to negotiate pay rates and provide them with the means to challenge potential pay discrimination. For employers, pay transparency can help to identify and address pay discrimination that might otherwise negatively affect the functioning of the enterprise and their reputation".

Key takeaways / Conclusion

Businesses should consider income inequality across all business processes, ensuring that addressing this gap is prioritised during recruitment, on-boarding, training and teambuilding, performance reviews, secondment opportunities, mentoring, and succession planning. The focus should be on empowering employees to have not only equal pay for work of equal value but also, for example, equitable access to work opportunities and training, the right to capital assets, as well as access to targeted programmes that focus on, for example, women’s health and wellbeing in the workplace.

Equality demands a commitment to transparency, collaboration and empowerment. In South Africa, Minister Patel has said that the impact of the income inequality situation has become so critical that citizens expect the government to act. We can therefore predict that further laws and regulations around pay transparency will be announced in the coming years. Most people-centric businesses are not waiting to be guided by law and have already begun implementing processes that will ensure equal pay and access to opportunity for everyone in the workforce.

Contact Information

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.