Switzerland: Home-office work of cross-border commuters - Extension of the current flexible social security system until 31 December 2022 but tax risks as from 1 July 2022

In brief

Due to the restriction in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, the European social security coordination law, which also applies in Switzerland, was applied flexibly until June 2022. As a result, cross-border commuters who used to work in Switzerland continued to be subject to Swiss social security legislation regardless of any work performed remotely from their country of residence. This regulation was supposed to expire at the end of June 2022. However, this flexible approach has been extended until 31 December 2022. Further, new and more flexible rules shall be effective as of 2023.


Similar flexible bilateral tax regimes had been agreed between Switzerland on one hand and France, Germany, Italy and Liechtenstein on the other. The agreement with Liechtenstein expired on 31 March 2022. The agreements with Germany will expire on 30 June 2022. On 29 June 2022 the agreement with France  was extended until 31 October 2022. A new agreement with France that shall replace the current regime is currently negotiated. The end of the agreement with Germany might have tax consequences for the employer and the employee.

Importance of cross-border commuters in Switzerland

Cross-border employees commuting to Switzerland have been of significant importance to Switzerland and cross-border cantons specifically. According to the Federal Statistical Office, in the first quarter of 2022, there have been more than 365,000 cross-border commuters, primarily from France, Italy and Germany.

Pre-pandemic situation

Generally, commuting cross-border employees are covered by the social security system in the country in which they ordinarily work. If they work in more than one jurisdiction, they are subject to the social security system of their country of residence if they perform a substantial part of their work there. Before the pandemic, the so-called "25% rule" or "no impact rule" applied, i.e., the work was considered substantial if the time spent and remuneration received from the activity in their country of residence accounted for at least 25%. In these cases, the employees had to be insured by the social security institution at their place of residence according to applicable legislation. The employer had to report and pay the pertinent contributions. While this obligation could be delegated to the employee by agreement, the employer remained liable if the employee failed to comply with its obligations.

The general rule of international taxation is that employment income is taxable in the country of residence. However, employment income taxation may also occur in the country of work if at least one of the following qualifiers is met: (i) the cross-border employee (e.g., a French tax resident) is working in another country (e.g., Switzerland) for more than 183 days during the relevant tax period or (ii) the remuneration is paid by an employer of the country of work (e.g., a Swiss employer) or (iii) the remuneration is borne by a permanent establishment of the foreign employer in the country of work (e.g., the Swiss permanent establishment of a French company).

In such cases, cross-border employees' employment income is taxable in the country of work. In the case of working days spent in both countries, employment income will be subject to a working days pro-rata allocation based on the effective (physical) place of work. Further, cross-border employees should trigger wage withholding tax duties (i.e., withholding and reporting) for the Swiss employer, subject to specific bilateral agreements.

Current situation

Due to restrictions in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, the European social security coordination law, which also applies in Switzerland, was applied flexibly. Early on, the EU recommended that the insurance status of commuting cross-border employees (subject to the Agreement of the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP) or EFTA Convention) should not change as a result of COVID-19 restrictions simply because the cross-border employees worked from home as a consequence of the pandemic.

This flexible approach was extended several times and was supposed to expire on 30 June 2022. However, the EU Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems (including social security authority representatives of all EEA member states and Switzerland) decided on 14 June 2022 to extend the flexible approach regarding the coordination of social security systems until 31 December 2022.

From a tax perspective, Switzerland entered into specific agreements, notably with France, Germany, Italy and Liechtenstein, regarding the impact of Covid-19 on cross-border employees, according to which working days spent by cross-border employees in their country of residence would count as working days spent in the country of work, a legal fiction aimed at maintaining the status-quo despite the lack of physical presence of cross-border employees in the country of work. The agreement with Liechtenstein has expired on 31 March 2022. The agreement with Germany will no longer apply as of 30 June 2022. The agreement with France has just been extended until 31 October 2022, and discussions are ongoing as to whether a new agreement would enter into force thereafter. The agreement with Italy provides for a tacit renewal and there is no currently foreseen expiration.

Further, although not part of the agreements, the question of a potential permanent establishment of the employer in the country of residence of cross-border employees (e.g., a potential foreign permanent establishment of a Swiss employer due to home-office work from cross-border employees) was, to our best knowledge, treated until now with pragmatism by the competent tax authorities.

A glance into the future

As of 1 January 2023, the existing rules concerning social security coordination law will be interpreted or modified to ensure that a certain extent of remote work performed from an employee's country of residence is permitted without changing the applicable social security system. How such change will be implemented will be negotiated and prepared in the coming months at a European level and between Switzerland and its neighboring countries. The Swiss Social Security Administration announced that it would provide further information about the specific implementation in due time.

Recommendation

The Swiss Social Security Administration's announcement highlights the importance of flexible working and shows that remote work truly has found its place in Europe. With the extension, employers have more time to assess the social security aspects of their cross-border employment relationships. We recommend that employers use the transitional phase to timely assess post-COVID-19 social security risks associated with remote working cross-border employees.

From a tax perspective, due to the end of the specific agreement regarding cross-border employees with Germany, Swiss employers currently considering implementing or having already implemented home-office policies should not only ensure up-to-date wage withholding tax process, including effective counting of working days spent in Switzerland but also carefully review whether home-office policies may trigger foreign tax exposure and related reporting duties, due to the potential recognition of permanent foreign establishments. In the absence of clear practice regarding the potential qualification of home offices as permanent establishments, related developments should be carefully monitored. The status and validity of the agreements between Switzerland on the one hand and France and Italy on the other should equally be carefully monitored.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.