Thailand: Human rights due diligence

In brief

In our previous article (link), we discussed international human rights due diligence (HRDD) trends, essential element in the "S" of the ESG (environment, social and governance) movement. In this article, we will take a closer look at HRDD trends in Thailand and what the implications might be for business operators in Thailand.


Contents

Human rights due diligence trends in Thailand

Under the Thai Constitution, human rights are fundamental and observable at government-level policy which provides protection, safety, and good occupational health for workers. Thailand's Labour Protection Act prescribes a minimum standard for workers as the main piece of legislation for labour protection. There is also a specific legal framework on maritime labour which has been adopted since 2015, in accordance with the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 of the International Labour Organization (ILO), to ensure that the maritime related workforce is treated fairly.

In addition, the Thai government, in cooperation with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), has published the first National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (2019-2022) (NAP) which primarily focuses on improving and addressing urgent and important human rights issues caused by business activities. The NAP includes the following four core areas:

  1. Labour;
  2. Community, land, natural resources and the environment;
  3. Human rights defenders; and
  4. Cross-border investment and multinational enterprises.

According to the UNDP, Thailand is the first country in Asia to have a stand-alone plan on business and human rights.

However, there is currently no specific legislation which imposes obligations on Thai companies to conduct HRDD. Nonetheless, the private sector, particularly those heavily involved with exporting and industries such as fishery, have been actively working with the government in monitoring human rights issues in their supply chains on a voluntary basis for some time. Non-government organizations also play a vital role in monitoring and publishing related reports.

Despite an absence of legal requirements for HRDD, some companies, including their suppliers, are required by their customers to conduct their own HRDD to ensure their entire operation and supply chain fully respect and comply with human rights and relevant legal obligations, especially those relating to their own employees and migrant workers.

What does it mean for business operators?

As mentioned in our previous article, HRDD is a promising approach to help address human rights issues and lift up global business standards to the next sustainable level while simultaneously creating a number of new obligations for business operators to comply with.

The method and implementation of HRDD related laws and regulations vary significantly in different jurisdictions. HRDD can be very complex depending on the value/supply chain structure and the nature of a business. Many existing HRDD related legislations are closely linked to domestic customs laws and may lead to the prohibition of the importation of goods which may have been produced by workers whose human rights were violated. Additionally, there is a growing number of investors and consumers asking enterprises how they manage risks related to human rights abuses. We have seen HRDD obligations increasingly being imposed by customers upon their manufacturers and suppliers in Thailand. The implications of these cannot be overlooked as the global supply chains are highly complex and interrelated. It can be argued that HRDD enforcement in Thailand will become inevitable. By the time HRDD becomes mandatory, the cross-border transactions will require more sophisticated compliance due diligence.

With HRDD becoming the norm, proactive implementation and corporate commitment in conducting HRDD will ensure and enhance the sustainability of businesses. To prepare for the new wave of HRDD trends, companies should start contemplating how HRDD can be implemented under the current supply chain structures.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.