United Kingdom: EHRC updates technical guidance on sexual harassment and harassment at work

In brief

The new duty on employers to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of employees will come into force on 26 October 2024. Following a consultation during the summer, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has published an eight-step guide to preventing sexual harassment at work and made further updates to its technical guidance on sexual harassment and harassment at work


Contents

Key takeaways

  • In the words of the EHRC, this new duty is “designed to transform workplace cultures by requiring employers to take positive and proactive reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of their workers”. It will sit alongside existing protections but demands a more proactive approach from employers to identify and address risk.
  • The guidance is clear that the duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment covers harassment by third parties as well as to its employees. Strictly speaking, an employee would not be able to bring a standalone claim in the employment tribunal about third-party harassment unless an employer's failure to act was itself discriminatory. However, the guidance indicates that the EHRC could bring separate enforcement action for third-party harassment (as part of an employer's failure to comply with its preventative duty).
  • Further information on the new duty can be found in our vlog from the London Baker McKenzie Employment Team’s Diving into Diversity Vlog series.

For advice or to discuss what this means for you and your business, please contact your usual Baker McKenzie contact.

In more detail

Technical guidance

The updated version of the technical guidance will be useful in determining what a reasonable step might entail. It suggests (for example) that relevant factors may include the likely effectiveness of a particular step, and that employers may take into account the time, cost and potential disruption of taking a particular step, weighed against the benefit it could achieve.

It also flags that compliance with relevant regulatory standards may impact whether a step is considered reasonable, as would whether concerns have already been raised with the employer regarding sexual harassment. If any steps have proved ineffective in the past, alternative action should be explored.

It also adds two new detailed example scenarios (a large firm in the construction industry and a hospital). The examples illustrate the process which the EHRC expects employers to go through when conducting a risk assessment, and provides useful examples of what reasonable steps might be, which may be transferable. The guidance is also clear that an employer is unlikely to be able to comply with the preventative duty unless they have carried out a risk assessment.

Eight-point plan

The EHRC has also published an eight-point plan, a helpful step-by-step guide to complying with the new duty. A few key points to flag include:

  • Content of policies: The plan provides fairly prescriptive guidance on what sexual harassment policies should contain, including flagging the employer’s preventative duty and aggravating factors in harassment cases (such as abuse of power). It also requires that policies address third-party harassment, including the fact that workers should report it and the steps which may be taken to avoid a repeat incident (e.g., warning or banning a customer).
  • Engagement with staff: The plan emphasises the importance of staff engagement to help the employer understand where the potential issues lie and whether the steps you are taking are working. Such engagement would include conducting regular 1-2-1 interviews with workers, as well as surveys and exit interviews.
  • Risk assessment: The plan suggests factors which might increase the likelihood of sexual harassment, which should be taken into account as part of your risk assessment (e.g., lack of diversity, power imbalances and job insecurities).
  • Reporting: Employers are advised to keep centralised records of all complaints, formal and informal in order to identify trends.
  • Training: There is an emphasis on the role of the witness in preventing sexual harassment in the workplace. The plan requires that training rolled out to staff should extend to both what to do when experiencing and witnessing harassment.
  • When complaints are made: It is important to protect witnesses as well as the complainant. The plan also includes a reminder regarding NDA issues (i.e., that they should only be used where it is lawful, necessary and appropriate to do so). The complaint outcome and right of appeal must also be communicated promptly.
  • Third party harassment: The plan emphasises the importance of reporting mechanisms, and assessing high-risk workplaces with a particular focus on lone workers.
  • Monitoring and evaluation of complaints: Regular evaluation of the steps you are implementing will be useful to ensure those steps remain effective. This could include lessons learned sessions, comparing survey feedback with reported complaints and inviting input from staff networks or trade unions.

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.