United Kingdom: The Pension Schemes Bill 2025 – Important changes for defined benefit pension schemes

In brief

The Pension Schemes Bill 2025 was published on 5 June 2025 and, at over 100 pages, is a significant piece of new pensions legislation relevant to trustees and employers of both defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) pension schemes.

Concentrating in this update on the changes in the Bill relevant to DB pension schemes, a key area relates to providing greater flexibility to trustees and employers to access surplus funds (and June Pensions Regulator guidance touches on the current use of surplus too – we see this as a live and important area even before legislative change). In addition, however, the Government is creating a permanent statutory regime for the authorisation and operation of DB consolidator "Superfunds", providing flexibility to reduce Pension Protection Fund (PPF) levies to zero and also confirming the Pensions Ombudsman's status as a body that can resolve disputes concerning pension overpayment "recoupment" exercises under the Pensions Act 1995.


Contents

In more detail

Release of funding surplus

The Bill should "fix" several perceived barriers related to the release of ongoing DB surplus. With further background in a Government consultation response released on 29 May 2025, the Government is clearly keen to pursue the dual aims of supporting investment in the UK and protecting (or enhancing) members' benefits. With this in mind, the Government proposes amending the existing framework for surplus extraction by:

  • Introducing a statutory resolution power for trustees to modify their scheme rules to pay surplus to the employer, or remove/relax any existing restrictions in a current power - use of this power will be at the discretion of the trustees.
  • Repealing Section 251 of the Pensions Act 2004, which previously required trustees to have passed a resolution by 5 April 2016 in order to retain use a refund power under scheme rules.
  • Amending the current legislation governing release of surplus from ongoing schemes so that a refund does not have to be "in the interests of members" (meaning that normal trustee decision-making considerations apply).
  • Prescribing the actuarial basis threshold to remove surplus (this will be set out in regulations but the consultation response notes that the Government is "minded" for the basis to be the "low-dependency" basis – i.e., lower than the current "buy-out" basis prescribed in legislation).

The Bill confirms that any Section 251 resolutions that were passed before 6 April 2016 will continue to have effect.

In addition, the Regulator will issue guidance to accompany the new regulations to "facilitate trustee comfort with extraction".

However, one change, that had been called for within the industry, to provide a statutory power allowing for direct payments to members was not taken forward in the Bill, although the Government commented in its consultation response that it will continue to consider this. It is also still considering the current tax treatment of surplus payments (having already reduced the relevant rate from 35% to 25%).

Separately, the Regulator issued new guidance for trustees and employers on 3 June 2025 that contained commentary on "running on" schemes and issues to consider in respect of surplus. Several recommendations were made to trustees to consider during the interim period before the surplus flexibilities are introduced (likely in 2027), including the preparation of a feasibility assessment, a policy on surplus extraction and agreeing various matters about how surplus will be shared with employers and members and even agreements on how surplus would be spent.

Confirming the Pensions Ombudsman status in overpayment recoupment disputes

Following the Court of Appeal's decision in the CMG case, it was clear that a Pensions Ombudsman's determination would not be sufficient under Section 91 of the Pensions Act 1995 to resolve a dispute between a member and trustees in relation to overpayment "recoupment" cases (i.e., repayment via deductions from future pension instalments). This has led to practical difficulties of trustees having to go through the further step of having to get a Pensions Ombudsman's determination effectively "rubber stamped" by a County Court. The Government has addressed this and has confirmed in the proposed amended legislation that an Ombudsman's determination in favour of trustees will "count" to resolve such a dispute, thus enabling trustees to proceed with the relevant recoupment exercise.

Establishment of DB superfund statutory regime

Although the DB superfund market is already active, with Clara having carried out several transactions, the regime has not yet been codified in legislation.

The Bill sets out the "skeleton" framework for the authorisation and ongoing supervision of DB superfunds, drawing on the regulatory regime already in operation under the Pensions Regulator. The vast bulk of the detail around the regime will be set out in secondary legislation, with consultation starting in 2026 and the legislation (and the Regulator's accompanying Code of Practice in this area) coming into force in 2028.

PPF levy flexibility

The Government and the PPF have been clear that they may set low or zero PPF levies in the future to "unlock growth" in the UK economy. Changes to the Pensions Act 2004 have therefore been made in the Bill to provide this flexibility.

Key takeaways

We anticipate that surplus extraction proposals will be the most relevant development in the Bill for trustees and employers of DB schemes. Although these flexibilities are at least two years' off, and further changes might be introduced to allow further flexibility, for example, in the form of one-off payment facilitation, it is clear that many employers and trustees are already discussing possible longer-term strategies, which may include running-on the pension scheme and extracting surplus. This is also evidenced by the Regulator's recent blog and guidance in this area. Where barriers exist to such surplus extraction processes, the proposed changes in the Bill will be welcome, but we would expect strategic discussions on this topic to continue even prior to 2027, with relevant support from advisers and the involvement of the Regulator, where needed.

Please speak to your usual contact at Baker McKenzie if you would like to discuss any aspects of the Pension Schemes Bill 2025 further.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.