United States: Immigration update — What employers should know about immigration changes in Q4

In brief

The Trump administration recently announced wide-ranging immigration policy changes that directly impact most employer-sponsored visa holders. While each update may seem minor or only pertinent to specific cases, they amount to notable changes when viewed collectively. The latest developments highlight the critical importance of staying informed of immigration changes and reviewing internal practices to ensure immigration compliance. Below is a summary of changes most likely to impact companies and their visa-holding employees.


In more detail

H-1B visa stamping now requires social media vetting, causing significant delays and appointment cancellations in India

  • All H-1B and H-4 visa applicants are subject to mandatory social media vetting, requiring that applicants set their social media profiles to public. This is an expansion of the social media vetting announced earlier in the year for student visa applicants.
  • This change in policy does not impact US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) filings and only applies to applicants for visa stamps at US Embassies or Consulates outside of the United States.
  • There have been widespread reports of H-1B visa appointments being cancelled and rescheduled due to the change in policy, particularly in India.

Key takeaway

Employers and employees should be prepared for H-1B and H-4 visa stamping to take longer due to this new process. Employers should know their visa population including H-1B (and H-4) employees who will travel for visa stamping given the possibility of cancellation and/or delay. Employers should have clear policy guidelines regarding remote work and consider contingency plans due to an employee’s extended absence abroad.

Gold Card Program goes live

  • The official website trumpcard.gov went live on December 10, 2025, and is accepting Gold Card applications. The three-step process involves (i) registration and fee payment; (ii) submission of the Form I-140G; and (iii) consular processing to obtain permanent residence.
  • Applicants pay a non-refundable USD 15,000 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) processing fee at submission, after which DHS initiates vetting.
  • Significant financial information and documentary evidence, particularly regarding the source of funds, will be required.
  • After successful vetting, applicants are instructed to make the government specified contribution:
    • USD 1 million for a self petitioning individual (and USD 1 million per accompanying spouse or child), or
    • USD 2 million for a corporate sponsored principal (plus USD 1 million per accompanying spouse or child).
  • The available information leaves open several questions regarding:
    • Timing. The official site states the process “should take weeks” once the fee and application are received, although it does not specify whether this estimate covers the initial portal application and/or I 140G adjudication. Consular processing typically takes several months to complete.
    • Impact of retrogression. A significant volume of applications could result in immigrant visa availability retrogression and extend the gold card process by several months or even years depending on country of birth of applicants.
    • Litigation. It remains unclear whether litigation will occur and, if so, how it would impact the process and/or applications submitted prior to any litigation.
    • Adjustment of status. Public materials to date do not clarify whether Gold Card applicants already in the United States may file Form I 485 to adjust status as an alternative to consular processing.

Key takeaway

Despite the opening of the gold card website and Form I-140G, much remains to be clarified. Interested employers and applicants should consult with legal counsel to consider the risks, including limited details on timing and potential implications of expression of immigrant intent, with the benefits of a potential clear path to permanent residence.

Employment Authorization Document (EAD) validity and automatic extension changes

  • For EAD applications (initial and renewal) filed or pending on or after December 5, 2025, the maximum validity period is reduced from five years to 18 months for: (i) refugees, (ii) asylees (and pending asylum applicants), (iii) adjustment of status applicants, and (iv) those with pending applications for suspension of deportation, cancellation of removal, or Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) relief.
  • For certain parole and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) categories, the maximum EAD validity is now one year or the end of the authorized period, whichever is shorter, for applications filed or pending on or after July 22, 2025.
  • As of October 30, 2025, the 540-day automatic extension for timely EAD renewal filings is eliminated for most categories. Employees in affected categories will lose work authorization the day after their EAD expires unless a new card is issued; they cannot work until the new EAD is received.
    • Employees in affected categories (including H-4 EAD) will lose work authorization the day after their EAD expires unless a new card is issued; they cannot work until the new EAD is received.
    • F-1 OPT STEM applicants are not affected and still receive a 180-day extension; spouses of L and E visa holders are also not affected.

Key takeaway

To avoid unauthorized employment and potential penalties, employers should immediately update their compliance procedures to track EAD expiration dates earlier, file renewals as early as permitted (up to 180 days in advance), and ensure no employee works beyond the EAD expiration unless a new card is issued.

Proposed changes to Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA)

  • US Customs and Border Protection has proposed a new rule that would significantly change the ESTA application process. ESTA, a visa waiver program for citizens of certain countries, has typically been a quick and easy application process for business travelers and tourists.
  • Under the new rule, the ESTA application would become significantly more detailed, including social media usage for the prior five years.
  • Given the significant increase in requested information, processing times are likely to increase, as are the likelihood of ESTA denial.

Key takeaway

If/when the rule becomes final, employers should be aware that the ESTA process will become more cumbersome and time consuming, impact business travel and visitors to the United States. Frequent travelers to the United States should apply for ESTA well in advance of any anticipated travel.

Recent changes highlight the importance of proactive planning for both employers and visa holders. Staying informed and adapting internal processes to meet evolving requirements can help minimize disruptions and avoid costly penalties.

Conclusion

These recent changes highlight the importance of proactive planning for both employers and visa holders. Staying informed and adapting internal processes to meet evolving requirements can help minimize disruptions and avoid costly penalties.

Please contact our Global Immigration and Mobility team for more information.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.