Australia: BNPL - If it looks like credit, acts like credit, regulate it

In brief

The assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones addressed the annual Responsible Lending & Borrowing Summit in Sydney. His speech is available here. His speech announced that Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) payment arrangements will be regulated as credit and enforced by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).


Contents

In an effort to make good on the Federal Government's commitments to take a tougher stance in the regulation of BNPL arrangements, this announcement seeks to set into effect the second option presented by the Treasury in November 2022. As discussed in our prior client alert, the second proposed option was presented as the 'moderate' or 'tailored approach to bring BNPL arrangements under the Credit Act and subject to responsible lending obligations, while remaining distinct from other licensed credit providers. It will require BNPL providers to assess suitability for customers, and to hold an Australian credit licence. ASIC will also be given 'strong enforcement powers'. Alternative options that were on the table included self-regulation within the BNPL industry and the more onerous option of treating BNPL like credit cards and other loans requiring full regulation under the Credit Act. Based on the Minister's strong language one could be mistaken by assuming that the option Treasury had landed on was the more onerous alternative and not the moderate option 2.

Background

There are now approximately 7 million BNPL accounts in Australia. It has been acknowledged that BNPL has provided financial opportunities to the many people who use it, however, according to Treasury's consultation, has also created great risk to those caught in a vicious debt cycle.

On 21 November 2022, the Treasury released an options paper  which offered three options to regulate BNPL.  As noted above, the options ranged from less onerous strengthening existing industry codes and self-regulation (option 1) to more onerous by means of a full Australian credit licence (option 3).

Based on its subsequent consultation, Treasury now concludes that because "BNPL looks like credit, it acts like credit, it carries the risks of credit". It therefore has announced that "government will change the law, so that buy now, pay later products are regulated as credit products."  Although the language of the announcement appears to take a hard line approach, the speech announced that Treasury has set itself on the middle 'moderate' option 2, which brings BNPL arrangements under the Credit Act, but under a tailored regime.

Key takeaways 

Under the proposed plan effectuating option 2, BNPL providers will be required to:

  • Hold an Australian Credit Licence
  • Comply with Responsible Lending Obligations
  • Meet statutory dispute resolution and hardship requirements
  • Comply with statutory product disclosure and other information obligations
  • Abide by existing restrictions on acceptable marketing
  • Meet a range of other minimum standards in relation to their conduct, and in relation to their products

Next steps 

The Treasury aims to work closely with the industry and consumer groups in the coming months to draft legislation, planning for such draft legislation to be rolled out later in 2023. A final Bill is expected to be introduced to Parliament by the end of the year.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.