Australia: ASIC reissues RG 121 "Doing financial services business in Australia"

ASIC has reissued Regulatory Guide 121 "Doing financial services business in Australia" in order to reflect legislative updates and amendments.

In brief

On 20 September 2024, ASIC reissued Regulatory Guide 121 Doing financial services business in Australia. This updated guide reflects the recent amendments to the law and legislative relief granted by ASIC. Key revisions include updating guidance relating to Australian financial services licensing exemptions and provision of further insight into the Australian court’s recent interpretation of ‘carrying on a business in Australia’.

Regulatory Guide 121 provides up to date guidance for foreign individuals and companies who are looking to engage in a financial services business in Australia.


Background

Regulatory Guide 121 Doing financial services business in Australia (RG 121) provides information and general guidance on the Australian financial services regime. In particular, RG 121 sets out the obligations associated with being an Australian financial services (AFS) licensee and provides guidance as to when a foreign person or company may be required to hold an AFS license, as well as any exemptions that may apply. This new version of RG 121 replaces the guidance previously issued by ASIC in June 2013.

Key amendments to RG 121

The reissued RG 121:

  • Removes outdated references to expired or repealed AFS licensing relief;
  • Updates and clarifies the licensing requirement exemptions which are currently available to eligible foreign financial services providers (FFSPs);
  • Provides an update on the Court’s interpretation of ‘carrying on a business in Australia’; and
  • Amends descriptions and updates references to financial products and services, obligations of AFS licensees, legislation administered by ASIC, other relevant rules and legislation, and ASIC’s regulatory documents.

Updated interpretation of ‘carrying on a business in Australia’

Importantly for overseas entities, ASIC has provided further guidance in RG 121 on how the Australian courts interpret what constitutes ‘carrying on a business in Australia’. The courts have stressed it is the factual circumstances which determine whether a body corporate’s activities constitute ‘carrying on a business in Australia’. ASIC has signaled the Courts have taken into account the ‘general indicators’ of carrying on a business in Australia, which includes a consideration of the degree of system, repetition and continuity of the activities of the business.

Additional guidance from ASIC has also indicated that the nature of the business being conducted and the statutory context are also relevantly considered. For example, ASIC has noted in RG 121 a recent 2022 case (albeit this case is in the statutory context of Australia's Privacy Act which focuses on a non-material concept being information) where an offshore entity was found to be ‘carrying on a business in Australia’ by installing and removing cookies on the devices of Australian users and providing a login functionality to Australian developers for use in Australia via the Graph API interface, even though this overseas entity had no physical assets, customer or revenues in Australia and their data processing centers were not located in Australia. The importance of ASIC referring to this case in RG 121 demonstrates the Australian court's malleable approach to determining what is considered 'doing business in Australia' for online businesses serving customers in Australia, even if those online businesses have a low degree of activity in Australia

Furthermore, ASIC has updated its guidance on a one-off transaction, which may amount to the carrying on of a business, if that single transaction was in pursuance of the intention to carry on a business and even if no other transaction has been effected so far.

Other relevant amendments and updates

Various amendments and updates have been made to RG 121, in order to bring the guidance more accurately in line with the current legal and regulatory frameworks. The following are some of the relevant amendments which have been made:

  • Establishing a new section ‘D – Are you exempt from holding an AFS license’, which provides an overview of licensing exemptions that may apply to foreign persons or companies;
  • Updates to references to sections of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and other regulatory guides, as well as the inclusion of references to regulatory instruments for further guidance on AFS license holder exemptions and obligations; and
  • Broadening the scope of the definition of ‘financial product’, to additionally capture interests in a notified foreign passport fund, deposit-taking facility made available by a bank foreign exchange contracts and Australian carbon credit units.

Interaction with the proposed new licensing exemptions for FFSPs

Whilst the updated RG 121 gives welcome guidance in relation to the current status of the extended FFSPs transitional reliefs, it, of course, does not cover the proposed new licensing exemptions for FFSPs under the Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 (currently before the Australian Senate), which, if passed by Parliament as drafted, may come into effect on 1 April 2025. For more information on the extended FFSPs transitional reliefs and the proposed new licensing exemptions see our most recent article on this topic: Australia: Another update for the FFSP exemptions.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.