Hong Kong: New developments from the SFC for the Open-ended Fund Company regime relating to customer due diligence and custodial requirements

In brief

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) published a number of developments to its open-ended fund companies (OFC) regime in the last few weeks of 2020. On 23 December 2020, the SFC released both its conclusions ("Conclusions") on the customer due diligence (CDD) requirements for OFC consultations and updated frequently asked questions (FAQ) relating to OFCs to clarify custodial requirements.

The Conclusions represent the culmination of the SFC's further consultation on the CDD requirements to be imposed on OFCs, as released in September 2020 in its consultation conclusions related to further enhancements to the OFC regime ("September Conclusions").1 The new CDD requirements will come into effect after a six-month transition period following the completion of the legislative process to amend the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO). The September Conclusions contained, amongst other things, liberalisation of the types of entities that can act as custodian and the updated FAQ provide clarification of the requirements for an OFC's custodial arrangements. We discuss the Conclusions and updated FAQ in more depth in this Alert.


Customer due diligence requirements

Pursuant to the Conclusions2, instead of requiring OFCs to maintain a significant controllers’ register, an OFC is required to appoint a responsible person to perform anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) functions; the appointment of which should be made by the board of directors of the OFC. The OFC's responsible person would carry out AML/CFT functions provided under Schedule 2 to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance, similar to the requirements imposed on limited partnership funds under the Limited Partnership Fund Ordinance in an effort to harmonise AML/CFT requirements across different investment vehicles.

Updated FAQ related to custodian requirements

The SFC has provided useful updates to its FAQ (adding questions 6A, 23, 24 and 25) relating to OFCs to clarify requirements for custodial arrangements, which include the following:

  • Further guidance on the documentation required for an application in which the proposed custodian for a private OFC is a licensed corporation or registered institution licensed or registered for Type 1 regulated activity, which includes evidence to demonstrate the proposed custodian's compliance with eligibility requirements under 7.1(b) of the Code on Open-ended Fund Companies ("OFC Code"). Such evidence includes, for example: (1) a copy of a valid certificate showing its licensing/registration status; (2) the name and CE number of the responsible officer(s) or executive officer(s) responsible for the overall management and supervision of its custodial function; (3) an updated organisational chart; and (4) where the existing systems and controls of the proposed custodian for the safekeeping of client assets of its Type 1 registered activity business will not be used for safekeeping of the scheme property of the OFC, a custody operational flowchart together with the reason(s) for not using such existing systems and controls for safekeeping of the OFC's assets.
  • An OFC may appoint multiple custodians, with each custodian required to comply with the requirements related to the safekeeping of the OFC's assets under the SFO and the OFC Code.
  • With respect to the segregation requirement for OFC assets, subscription money received and held pending the allotment of shares in the relevant private OFC is not considered property of the OFC, but rather is held on behalf of the subscribing investors until the subscription is accepted.
  • Further guidance on the meaning of "accounting" records in terms of recordkeeping for purposes of paragraph 7 of Appendix A to the OFC Code. For example, the records should enable all movements of the OFC's assets to be traced through the private OFC custodian’s systems with frequent reconciliations.

Effective date

Whilst the guidance provided by the updated FAQ is effective immediately, the new CDD requirements will come into effect after a six-month transition period following the completion of the legislative process to amend the SFO.

Additional resources

As part of the published material for OFC developments, the SFC also released an updated Information Checklist, as published on the SFC website. 


We will continue to monitor further developments in the OFC regime as the SFC refines the necessary legislative changes to give further effect to its proposals. If you have any questions on any of the above matters, please do not hesitate to liaise with your usual contact at Baker McKenzie or the lawyers listed in this Alert.

1 Please refer to our previous client alert regarding the OFC enhancements for a more detailed separate discussion on prior changes to the OFC regime: https://insightplus.bakermckenzie.com/bm/financial-institutions_1/hong-kong-sfc-confirms-enhanced-open-ended-fund-company-regime.

2 https://apps.sfc.hk/edistributionWeb/gateway/EN/consultation/product-authorization/conclusion?refNo=20CP3

Contact Information

Copyright © 2023 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.