3. Financial Institutions
  5. International: Boats against the current? Credit-sensitive rates after LIBOR

International: Boats against the current? Credit-sensitive rates after LIBOR

22 Aug 2023    1 minute read
LIBOR FSR BF Featured Content

In brief

Two credit-sensitive USD interest rates have been dealt a severe blow. The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has issued a statement expressing that the administrators of the Bloomberg Short-term Bank Yield Index (BSBY) and Ameribor should refrain from representing that such rates comply with the IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks.

It is too early to tell whether the IOSCO statement tolls the death knell for BSBY, Ameribor and other USD credit-sensitive rates, although it may well inhibit the use of such rates.

The US Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act of 2021 ("US LIBOR Act") permits US banks to use such rates, even if they do not comply with the IOSCO Principles.

Contents

  1. Key takeaways

Key takeaways

  1. Two credit-sensitive USD interest rates that compete with SOFR in the US loan market have suffered a significant recent setback. IOSCO has issued a statement expressing that the administrators of BSBY and Ameribor should refrain from representing that such rates comply with the IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks.
  2. IOSCO's statement may well inhibit the use of BSBY and Ameribor. Market participants look to IOSCO for guidance even though IOSCO is not a regulator and the US does not have a benchmark regime that is similar to the benchmarks regulations in effect in the EU and the UK, which reflect the IOSCO Principles.
  3. IOSCO's criticisms of BSBY and Ameribor echo concerns raised by US and UK regulators, such as the following:
    1. The reliance of such rates on the bank commercial paper (CP) and certificate of deposit (CD) markets renders them noncompliant with the IOSCO Principles, because such markets are not deep, robust or reliable enough to underpin these rates as financial benchmarks in compliance with the IOSCO Principles.
    2. Such rates repeat the "inverted pyramid" problem to which LIBOR was subject.
  4. It is too early to tell whether the IOSCO statement tolls the death knell for BSBY, Ameribor and other USD credit-sensitive rates (CSRs). Some lenders have indicated a preference for rates that reflect counterparty credit risk, like BSBY and Ameribor. The US LIBOR Act permits US banks to use such rates, even if they do not comply with the IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks.
  5. In addition to regulatory issues, BSBY and Ameribor face competition from SOFR and other products that do not refer to the CP and CD markets.

Click here to access the full alert.

Contact Information
Mark Tibberts
Partner
New York
Read my Bio
mark.tibberts@bakermckenzie.com
Caitlin McErlane
Partner
London
Read my Bio
caitlin.mcerlane@bakermckenzie.com
Matthew Smith
Counsel
New York
Read my Bio
matthew.smith@bakermckenzie.com
John Lawlor
Attorney
Chicago
Read my Bio
john.lawlor@bakermckenzie.com

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.

HighQ
Copyright Baker McKenzie 2024 | Disclaimers | Supplemental Privacy Statement